Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Digicam recommendations, please...

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-27-2003 | 09:54 PM
  #11  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Name your price range and whether you want something pocket-sized and are willing to give up some image quality in exchange, or if you want the best image quality in a perhaps bigger package. Also most cameras come with no bigger than a 16 MB card which doesn't hold that many pictures so you may want to buy a higher-capacity card.
Old 05-27-2003 | 09:55 PM
  #12  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,578
Likes: 0
From: oakland, ca
Default Re: Digicam recommendations, please...

Originally posted by SaviouR
I took over 50+ pictures at a school club picnic and half of them were blank, due to the fact that the film was exposed while I was putting it in. It took a while, because it is old camera, and I cannot afford to have these mishaps any longer. This was a fairwell picnic to the Seniors in the club and am royally pissed off about it.

If anybody can make recommendations, it will be greatly appreciated...
what kinda features? just want a point and shoot camera? or stuff you can adjust.

Originally posted by DC2
I've been having my eye on the Canon Powershot A60 for a month now.
the a70 is cheap as ever. i think* they are around $250....*think.


Originally posted by asiandoood
nikon. :thumbup:
:thumbup: great cameras.

Originally posted by thewretchedbeaver
canon s400
:bowdown: if you wanna spend that much.


Originally posted by kento
nikon coolpix 2100/3100 are really nice/not too expensive

i would recommend the 3100. its small, compact, and takes great pics. its a very point and shoot type camera. cant really do much adjusting. i had it for about 2 weeks. i only returned it because i needed something with more adjustability and its too small and light. i have shakey hands.
__________________
.
Old 05-27-2003 | 09:56 PM
  #13  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,578
Likes: 0
From: oakland, ca
Default

Originally posted by SaviouR
I am looking for something under $400, and that is with the memory card...
for $400 you can get a great camera. you should decide if you need such a good camera. if you arent planning to use all that adjustabitlity or print huge pics...you can get by just fine with a cheaper camera.
__________________
.
Old 05-27-2003 | 10:00 PM
  #14  
The Beav's Avatar
The Beav
i
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by WiLL
for $400 you can get a great camera. you should decide if you need such a good camera. if you arent planning to use all that adjustabitlity or print huge pics...you can get by just fine with a cheaper camera.
i just want insane good quality pics and small size and a resolution of at least 1600x1200, that has it all
Old 05-27-2003 | 10:06 PM
  #15  
b00gers's Avatar
b00gers
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 58,578
Likes: 0
From: oakland, ca
Default

Originally posted by thewretchedbeaver
i just want insane good quality pics and small size and a resolution of at least 1600x1200, that has it all
1600x1200 to print? or to view on a monitor? the nikon 3100 can do that also. and its less than $300.


but the powershot cameras are dope too.:thumbup:
__________________
.
Old 05-27-2003 | 10:42 PM
  #16  
reech-around's Avatar
reech-around
RIP Woong.
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 17,284
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca
Default

i have a sony dsc-s50 and a nikon 995. the nikon takes better pics, but the sony is more user-friendly and more convenient for snapshots. sometimes it's better to have two digicams, instead of a do-it-all cam (assuming you're as picky as me).
__________________
.
Old 05-27-2003 | 10:46 PM
  #17  
The Beav's Avatar
The Beav
i
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,277
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by WiLL
1600x1200 to print? or to view on a monitor? the nikon 3100 can do that also. and its less than $300.
both, i'm gonna try and start doing more with photoshop, i need a camera that can take good action shots too because the area where the camera's gonna see the most use is at the auto-x
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:30 PM
  #18  
steveng's Avatar
steveng
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
Default

for 4 mega pixel, Canon power shot S45
for 5 mega pixel, canon power shot S50........hands down
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:44 PM
  #19  
frank's Avatar
frank
frank from canada
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Default

just so that you know from my digicam buying experience, i always thought sony was "da shiet" and i was looking at a particular sony model when i wanted to get one but then i asked around and read some forums and found out that sony's camear stuff even though "good" or "sleek" was really a bunch of stuff made to satisfy peoples post modernist quest for style. if you want something that actaully takes good pictures and worth your money feature wise, i'd recommend a nikon or a canon camera.
Old 05-27-2003 | 11:46 PM
  #20  
asiandoood's Avatar
asiandoood
sancho on the sizzide!
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 27,129
Likes: 0
Default

here's my take. it doesnt matter how good the camera is. if you cant take pictures... a million dollar camera wont do shit for you.
__________________
[ASIANDOOOD.COM] [INSPIRE USA] [FACEBOOK] [ENDLESS 8]
F/S: JDM EG9 Parts - PM me for info



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 PM.