For those of you against the war....
#141
btw, a realistic War on Terror update:
Afganistan is no longer a base for Al Quaida and in 2 years time have taken large steps towards having a gov't that is not represive and representative of the people. And bin laden is on the run in Pakistan while we have captured or killed many of his top liutenants.
Iraq's former first sons are dead and countless numbers of former Baathist Party members have been arrested after 6 months. A provisional government has been formed leading to the creation of a democratic government in Iraq...one which is not oppresive.
Thanks to America finally standing up and saying enough to terrorism and its sponsors the world is a lot safer place than it was 2 years ago!
Afganistan is no longer a base for Al Quaida and in 2 years time have taken large steps towards having a gov't that is not represive and representative of the people. And bin laden is on the run in Pakistan while we have captured or killed many of his top liutenants.
Iraq's former first sons are dead and countless numbers of former Baathist Party members have been arrested after 6 months. A provisional government has been formed leading to the creation of a democratic government in Iraq...one which is not oppresive.
Thanks to America finally standing up and saying enough to terrorism and its sponsors the world is a lot safer place than it was 2 years ago!
#142
Originally posted by 18secFerio
God forbid we try and find a middle ground. But that would be too logical.
God forbid we try and find a middle ground. But that would be too logical.
#143
A little chin music
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Originally posted by dliske
Assuming it is the terrorists that you believe we should find a "middle ground" with, how can you expect reasonable negotiations with groups whose members strap on explosives, blow themselves and innocents to smithereens, all in the name of their God, among other things?
Assuming it is the terrorists that you believe we should find a "middle ground" with, how can you expect reasonable negotiations with groups whose members strap on explosives, blow themselves and innocents to smithereens, all in the name of their God, among other things?
#144
How can you try and negotiate with people that blow up the UN compund in Baghdad and the Jordanian Embassy as well as the Iraqi infrastructure? The UN is there to help the Iraqi's rebuild after the war, the Jordanian's are a fellow Arab country they attacked, and blowing up oil and water pipelines does nothing but hurt ordinary Iraqis. They do not listen to reason...all they are is a group of uncivilized, crazed lunatics.
#145
Well, DVPGSR and Fastball, I know that YOU knew the answer, I just was curious to see what "18" had to say. All the wrong stuff happens with my questions...sheez, I'm still waiting for sxecrow to respond to my last ones. Take care...
#146
A little chin music
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
From: Cleveland, Ohio - Rock 'n Roll capitol of the World
Originally posted by dliske
Well, DVPGSR and Fastball, I know that YOU knew the answer, I just was curious to see what "18" had to say. All the wrong stuff happens with my questions...sheez, I'm still waiting for sxecrow to respond to my last ones. Take care...
Well, DVPGSR and Fastball, I know that YOU knew the answer, I just was curious to see what "18" had to say. All the wrong stuff happens with my questions...sheez, I'm still waiting for sxecrow to respond to my last ones. Take care...
#149
Tom,
No big deal. To a certain degree, I was asking rhetorically (to those that know better) and specifically to "18." Now, I'm just having fun with you guys. Either way, with the above questions, and those I posed to "crow," (which I'm sure you noticed he "overlooked") I REALLY would like to see what these guys have as possible answers. Unlike many people here, they simply throw darts without giving any possible solutions. I'd like to know what alternatives they have...and we'll go from there. Regards.
No big deal. To a certain degree, I was asking rhetorically (to those that know better) and specifically to "18." Now, I'm just having fun with you guys. Either way, with the above questions, and those I posed to "crow," (which I'm sure you noticed he "overlooked") I REALLY would like to see what these guys have as possible answers. Unlike many people here, they simply throw darts without giving any possible solutions. I'd like to know what alternatives they have...and we'll go from there. Regards.
#150
Not overlooking, I dont feel like answering. It's gotten so far away from topic that it's pointless to argue it anymore.
Fact: we wanted war because of WMD
Fact: they havent found any
Now your presumptions (might be true, but not facts YET):
1) they sold them to terrorists (hope not)
2) we'll find them ... I guess before the elections, right?
Heres the problem, fact and presumption are 2 different things. Bush went to war on the hunch they had WMD ... well where are they? Thats all I'm saying. American and Iraqi lives were lost and there's nothing to show for it. Oh ... we saved people from a dictator, but that's not our business, nor was it our reason to go to war in the first place. We might find them, and if we do ... so be it, war was justified.
Fact: we wanted war because of WMD
Fact: they havent found any
Now your presumptions (might be true, but not facts YET):
1) they sold them to terrorists (hope not)
2) we'll find them ... I guess before the elections, right?
Heres the problem, fact and presumption are 2 different things. Bush went to war on the hunch they had WMD ... well where are they? Thats all I'm saying. American and Iraqi lives were lost and there's nothing to show for it. Oh ... we saved people from a dictator, but that's not our business, nor was it our reason to go to war in the first place. We might find them, and if we do ... so be it, war was justified.