Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

Is the TSX over rated or is my Integra faster?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-06-2004 | 11:23 AM
  #1  
ADRONICUS's Avatar
ADRONICUS
Thread Starter
www.ufc.com
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,920
Likes: 0
From: Irvine CA
Default Is the TSX over rated or is my Integra faster?

As you guys may know my car has been at Acura since last tuesday. Friday I was given a loaner. A 2004 Acura TSX. 2.4L I-VTEC. So tell me this if you guys know. Do you think they govern or manage the loaners is some way so the car does not have full performance? Cause the TSX i have outside right now is not all that impressive. I honestly feel if I were to take this car to a track and race my car in stock trim, my GSR would win. The TSX does not kick down like I thought it would. So maybe they retarded the fuel or something? I don't know...but it does not seem like it is all that. It's real nice, but lacks cajones from what I can see.
Old 12-06-2004 | 12:00 PM
  #2  
1funride's Avatar
1funride
99 Integra LS
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: California (Bay Area)
Default

I test drove a Type S for a half an hour. I think they rock. Better overall perfomace in the enging, tranny, and suspension over the 99 Integra I own. IMO
Old 12-06-2004 | 12:22 PM
  #3  
BonzoAPD's Avatar
BonzoAPD
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,353
Likes: 0
From: Ossining, New York
Default

Originally Posted by 1funride
I test drove a Type S for a half an hour. I think they rock. Better overall perfomace in the enging, tranny, and suspension over the 99 Integra I own. IMO

There are no TSX Type S's :slap:
Old 12-06-2004 | 12:23 PM
  #4  
Derek's Avatar
Derek
you motorboatin' s.o.b.
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 29,656
Likes: 0
From: Mexico, by Jaymar
Default

is your teggy a 5speed and the tsx is an auto?
Old 12-06-2004 | 12:24 PM
  #5  
BonzoAPD's Avatar
BonzoAPD
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,353
Likes: 0
From: Ossining, New York
Default

Originally Posted by centerforce99
As you guys may know my car has been at Acura since last tuesday. Friday I was given a loaner. A 2004 Acura TSX. 2.4L I-VTEC. So tell me this if you guys know. Do you think they govern or manage the loaners is some way so the car does not have full performance? Cause the TSX i have outside right now is not all that impressive. I honestly feel if I were to take this car to a track and race my car in stock trim, my GSR would win. The TSX does not kick down like I thought it would. So maybe they retarded the fuel or something? I don't know...but it does not seem like it is all that. It's real nice, but lacks cajones from what I can see.

Is the loaner an auto? If so that is part of the reasoning. Also, the TSX is totally different from a GSR. It is heavier, longer and much more refined. It is not meant to be a balls out car likemany GSR drivers turn their GSR's into. Stock for stock they should both pull the same 0-60 times.
Old 12-06-2004 | 12:24 PM
  #6  
TheOtherDave™'s Avatar
TheOtherDave™
Apathy Kills
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 60,714
Likes: 0
From: The Left Lane
Default

I doubt they'd go to the trouble of putting an additional governor on a dealer loaner car. The auto(?) tranny is probably a big enough detriment to performance. :chuckles:

A general note about these sorts of threads:
Magazines and independent testing firms publish their findings.
Use them to get your answer, if you want an objective one.

Moved. Because I can.
__________________
:: :ToDspin: - supermod - but who gives a shit?

:: HAN Integra FAQ: If, by some miracle, yours hasn't been stolen... check it out!
Old 12-06-2004 | 12:53 PM
  #7  
Rezza's Avatar
Rezza
Tell your mom I said hi!
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,096
Likes: 0
From: Greensboro, NC / Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by 1funride
I test drove a Type S for a half an hour. I think they rock. Better overall perfomace in the enging, tranny, and suspension over the 99 Integra I own. IMO

you thinkin of at TL-S?
Old 12-06-2004 | 12:55 PM
  #8  
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Default

The autos absolutely suck every HP possible out of the 2.4 K-Series. Drive a stick, different story.
Old 12-06-2004 | 01:09 PM
  #9  
CivicSiRacer's Avatar
CivicSiRacer
Honorary Moderator Alumni
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 8,735
Likes: 0
From: Someplace with cones=AUTO
Default

The TSX has better usable torque due to the larger engine displacement. Although I think the new 2005 RSX-S is quicker. BUT you cannot reprogram the ECU through Hondata in the 2005s.
__________________
Sponsored by: KAM Racing Sports, Falken Tires, Progress Technology, Brady's High Performance, Taggart Performance Engineering, Rotora Brakes
Autocross is: 90% driver, 5% car, & 5% CRAZY MOJO!
Autocross Help Page
Old 12-06-2004 | 01:46 PM
  #10  
George Knighton's Avatar
George Knighton
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,715
Likes: 1
From: Virginia (Besieged)
Default

Originally Posted by centerforce99
The TSX does not kick down like I thought it would. So maybe they retarded the fuel or something? I don't know...but it does not seem like it is all that. It's real nice, but lacks cajones from what I can see.
If you're comparing a K motor to a B motor like the one in your GS-R, you will notice a distinct lack of VTEC kicking in.

The K motor's i-VTEC, even in the full implementations like the TSX and RSX Type S, is nothing as dramatic as the old VTEC in cars like the ITR and GS-R. That doesn't mean you're not accelerating quickly, however.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 PM.