not true

well, considering the "Anyone but Bush" party, I wouldn't be surprised.

I mean, I'm no fan of Bush either, but the last thing I'd want to do is vote for someone who could potentially become worse than him.

I don't understand why anyone could still be supporting him.....

even my father, the ultra-conservative, is starting to dislike bush.

living in texas, and having him as a former governer, I knew he wasn't the brightest light bulb out there, but he choose what I thought could be a great cabinet.... Who, as recent events have shown, isn't as great as I thought....

just a note: Bush put more inmates to death than any modern American Governer.... Any.

since when is the majority always right?

remember when segrigation was right? or male superiority?

times have changed.....

well, considering 100million people waste their votes by doing nothing, I'm sure the last thing I would want to be worried about was wasting my vote on someone whom I felt actually would be capable of leading this country in the right direction.

So what then, should I vote for someone I don't agree with, like Bush? Should I vote for someone who doesn't take a fixed stand at ANYTHING, like Kerry? How would this not be wasting a vote?

.....but what am I, but some "stupid liberal"

yeah, my whole life revolves around doing the opposite just for the attention

I didn't know you knew me so well.....

Frankly, I come to beleive what I do because I think it is right. Because I'm an idealist who doesn't like to be told how it is, and I like to go out and actually experieince it for myself, and draw my own conclusions.

so they happen to not go with the flow all the time :dunno: I guess that just means I do it on purpose so people will think I'm coll

hmm, didn't I say he doesn't stand much a chance? I know I did.....

and I'm aware that its nothing revolutionary, but in a time where Republicans are trying to tighten their grasp of power even more (redistricting), and Demo's are still crying over '00 (the anti-bush bandwagon as of the past year (what have I been saying all along about iraq? since the fawking begining....) not to mention the sour feelings twords nader)......

you know, I'm surprised more demo's don't wake up to the fact that their party is a joke. Sure, its the lesser of two evils in one respect, but they're evil none the less.....

given the choice between bush and the demo's, I'd just not vote. But if I didn't vote, who would I be?

thus, the reason for Nader running.....

you obviously cared enough to post

well, 4% of the total vote isn't alot of heads.

Figure 40% of the 4% is alot to make a difference? How about this:

Take florida for example. 25% of naders votes came from Democrats. 38% came from republicans. Does that not seem strange?

There's so much bullshit that went on during the 2000 election its not even funny. Especially in Florida. 38% of naders votes were republicans? Maybe there was a problem with the booths :fawk:

but whatever. Keep lying to yourself and saying Nader blew gores chance at winning. Point is, Gore DIDN'T win. Get over it. I did, despite my feelings for bush.....

thats how you feel. Personally, I think he's the best choice out there.

Give me someone better, and I'll vote for them. But I'll be damned to vote one of the two parties before I vote Nader.

why would you want kerry in office? So he can make a disicion, and then go back on it 2 weeks later?

please, even Bush is more predicatable than Kerry. I much rather have a warmonger I can kinda understand vs. someone whom I don't even know what he beleives in.

me too, but I still think he's worth the thought. Even if he doesn't make the ballot, I'll still write him in.

besides, 700,000 signatures isn't easy.....

talk to the people who moved on-topic into off-topic.

ego tripping? Or are you just upset because you think he's threatening the Demo ticket? If thats the case, then its something personal.....

Democrats have very hostile feelings twords nader. Again, they think he cost Gore the election.

Gore screwed himself. If he didn't blow it in the NWern states, florida wouldn't have even been a problem....

Simple: look at the things he's voted for the past few decades, and compare them. You'll see inconsistancies....

:werd:

I totally agree with you

however....

I do not agree with this. I know, I hate bush.... But I'm not gonna compromise my beliefs just "to beat bush."

come on, thats obsured.... But thats just me....

 

but with his voting on GWI and GWII, his stance on Minimal sentencing, and other such nonesense, how can you overlook that?

I don't blame him for being anti-war after Vietnam. Most everyone was. That was a fawked up deal.

heh, if I thought you were talking about me, I'd might actually get mad.

of course, this being the internet, and you not knowing very much about me, I have no reason to be mad.

you're just ignorant.

 

according to cbs.. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/...in589996.shtml ....

i seem to be finding these numbers everywhere. where are you getting that 38% of his votes were from republicans?

 

that poll is for total votes

38% was an exit poll in florida

 

Because I want to vote for the person that is most likely to unseat Bush. A vote for a candidate that I know has no chance of being elected, does nothing to help get rid of Bush. Aside from that I don't think Nader has the sense to realistically run the country and I disagree with some of his points of view; but the overriding thing is that I choose to vote for someone that at the very least will be an improvement over Bush.
Don't flatter yourself. If you improved your reading comprehension skills you would see that in fact, I was talking about my observations of actual people back in 2000. You know, those carbon-based life forms that sit in front of their computers and type things?

 

well, have fuin doing that.

remembering where I live, you'll understand why I didn't care that much when Bush wins texas again, more reason to vote for Nader

cool guy :goodjob:

 

i'm supporting bush. i have my views, you have yours, that is why many people still support bush. and what does bush putting more inmates to death than any other governor prove? other than that he supports the death penalty?

:werd: