Notices
The Basement Non-Honda/Acura discussion. Content should be tasteful and "primetime" safe.

My speech for the day (republicans and war hawks, come have a field day)

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-15-2004 | 10:17 PM
  #51  
Epoch's Avatar
Epoch
CHRISTMASTIME IN IRAQ
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12,413
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Default

Originally posted by RB26DETT
oh yeah... and i agree with kfar09. first of all, bush's oppenents need to take the time that they put into making fun of him and actually concentrate that time into arguing intelligently against him. second, he's the fukkin leader of the country, even if you do not like his position, he still should be respected. my dad always said that americans never have any respect for each other, i guess he's right.
See, I'm not gonna stereotype anybody, but a LOT of republicans I knew took every opportunity to poke fun at Clinton, and so while I don't know how anyone else on this board has reacted to past presidents, the likely thing is that people have made fun of leaders with divergent viewpoints from themselves...

And I look at the jokes like Gravedigger's humor... I personally think W's policies are literally a threat to healthy living on this planet... I mean I know realistically he wouldn't be singlehandedly responsible, but what he's ALLOWING is, in my opinion, a curse on future americans...
Old 01-15-2004 | 10:24 PM
  #52  
axemansean's Avatar
axemansean
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 0
Default Re: My speech for the day (republicans and war hawks, come have a field day)

Originally posted by MrFatbooty
I am no longer willing to tolerate the opinions of those who seek to plunge this country further into war. It is completely unacceptable and never will be unless our sovereignty is threatened. It has not been threatened, contrary to what the Bush administration and its sympathizers would have us believe. One cannot fault the soldiers for obeying their training. Place the blame where it belongs: with the commander in chief of the United States military forces, his administration, and the people that voted him into office. The decisions these individuals make are fueled by paranoia and xenophobia and will only serve to isolate our contry from the rest of the world. We did not become as great a nation as we are by shutting out others, we did so by embracing them. This administration has done everything in its power to make the American public feel scared and afraid of "what ifs" and "maybes." We need to overcome our fear of the rest of the world and take note of the fact that we are truly the greatest country in the world. We cannot live our day-to-day lives worrying about contingencies and worst-case scenarios and terror alerts. We need to realize that war is not the answer to the problems of our generation and to engage in it makes us no better than our predecessors. We need progress, not more killing.
For once Mike I absolutely agree with you. America would not be America without the input of all the little countries we are meddling with. I am sick of hearing about this war, we may be the greatest nation today but the way we are going tomorrow we might be calling for help.
Old 01-15-2004 | 11:29 PM
  #53  
03accordcoupe's Avatar
03accordcoupe
^New car...2003 BMW 330ci
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Default

Originally posted by Epoch
Well, now I'm curious... how do draw a line directly between Clinton and this... I always thought of it as a case of no one in the world reacing properly...

These things wouldn't happen with Bush. Some(many) say his foreign policy is too aggressive, but learning from your predecessors mistakes is something you must do. He saw a risk of something similiar to Rwanda occurring in Iraq(though he may have been too late, seeing as how several million were killed under Saddam), and didn't want to make the same mistake as Clinton. Clinton has been quoted as saying he made a huge mistake in not intervening, it's not that tough of a line to draw...
Old 01-16-2004 | 12:20 AM
  #54  
wedley2's Avatar
wedley2
bboy Wesley West
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 0
From: six-five-o
Default

Originally posted by Epoch
Respect has to be earned, and he has yet to earn any from me
Exactly! you just dont giv respect to someone jsut for the hell of it.
.................... /´¯/)
..................../¯.. /
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........'\'...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\ the prez, he doesnt deserve any of my respect.
I have the right to give my respect to anyone i want, you cant force me.
Old 01-16-2004 | 12:46 AM
  #55  
Kestrel's Avatar
Kestrel
Push to shock!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,583
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto, CA
Default

Originally posted by 03accordcoupe
These things wouldn't happen with Bush. Some(many) say his foreign policy is too aggressive, but learning from your predecessors mistakes is something you must do. He saw a risk of something similiar to Rwanda occurring in Iraq(though he may have been too late, seeing as how several million were killed under Saddam), and didn't want to make the same mistake as Clinton. Clinton has been quoted as saying he made a huge mistake in not intervening, it's not that tough of a line to draw...
So instead you split your army to fight two wars on different fronts. In addition, you have major security obligations in Korea, Japan, and Europe. There is problem with being overly aggressive too...the US army is spread really thin. During the Rwandan crisis, part of the reason the US didn't join is because we were already stationed in the aforementioned countries, as well as Saudi Arabia and Bosnia.

So there is a question of whether a country should get involved in the civil wars of other countries, especially if there are no interests to protect. The US had one about 150 years ago, and the British, had they decided to do so, would have intervened on behalf of the Confederacy, and if they did we'd probably singing Dixie as our national anthem today (or possibly God Save the Queen). Do you always want other countries barging in on your business, even if it is the business of war?
Old 01-16-2004 | 01:00 AM
  #56  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Thread Starter
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

I think what really needs to happen is that as many people as possible need to get out there and vote. Nobody cared about the 2000 election until after it turned into the fiasco it did because of vote counting. The country was relatively stable at the time and since overall a good portion of regular folks out there were happy with the status quo there was not a lot of political discussion going on.

I think one thing Bush has done positively is get a lot more people involved in politics, even if they are fundamentally opposed to his ideas and his administration. So whatever it is you may feel about the state of things as they are right now, do the right thing and get out the vote. The only way we have a truly representative government is if the people in office embody the ideas of the public.

I can only hope there are enough people out there that are not hardcore Republicans and can see that Bush has done enough harm to our country, and that they vote accordingly.
Old 01-16-2004 | 01:06 AM
  #57  
axemansean's Avatar
axemansean
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by MrFatbooty
I think what really needs to happen is that as many people as possible need to get out there and vote. Nobody cared about the 2000 election until after it turned into the fiasco it did because of vote counting. The country was relatively stable at the time and since overall a good portion of regular folks out there were happy with the status quo there was not a lot of political discussion going on.

I think one thing Bush has done positively is get a lot more people involved in politics, even if they are fundamentally opposed to his ideas and his administration. So whatever it is you may feel about the state of things as they are right now, do the right thing and get out the vote. The only way we have a truly representative government is if the people in office embody the ideas of the public.

I can only hope there are enough people out there that are not hardcore Republicans and can see that Bush has done enough harm to our country, and that they vote accordingly.
The problem is some of the people who want to vote can't because the immigration laws prevents them from doing so. Oh I would love to vote against some of the idiotic things I see, but law says I can't. When a country has a majority of foreign nationals and the rest are all sheep to the media you are left with a handful of people who actually vote for the right reasons.
Old 01-16-2004 | 01:15 AM
  #58  
wedley2's Avatar
wedley2
bboy Wesley West
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,390
Likes: 0
From: six-five-o
Default

definetely, too bad i dont turn 18 before the election though. my friend does, hes got my vote.
Old 01-16-2004 | 06:24 AM
  #59  
Bl@ck's Avatar
Bl@ck
Sinner
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,599
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
Default

Originally posted by Epoch
Yes, the economy did need to take a time to restructure... it has to every once in a while... but a loss of over 2.5 million jobs isn't a "restructuring"
sure it is.. the loss of jobs we are seeing and have seen over the past couple years is due to one simple thing... cheap labor elsewhere... there were two things that your precious clinton did while in office that strongly contributed to that. first, the increase in minimum wage, which caused an increase in the jobless rate simply because businesses had to shell out more money for their work force. secondly, NAFTA, which gave these businesses that lost a significant amount of profit with the minimum wage hike a place to do business and make up their lost profit. Now, those "average joe" type of people that the minimum wage hike helped initially are in the unemployment line. the restructuring is jobs going elsewhere for less money
Old 01-16-2004 | 07:11 AM
  #60  
ManInCamo's Avatar
ManInCamo
Old School Crew
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 5,251
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by vassil3427
Maybe it was one of those mail order diplomas

And enron wasnt the only one..MANY companies overstated earnings and such...

This is why I normally never post on this website, its like walking into Democrat headquarters....And there are plenty of foot soldiers waiting to shoot me.

I have very conservative opinions...And I love my President, not just for what he does, but simply because he is the President. He should be respected.

I wont be posting here anymore, simply because almost all of you have far left opinions...and I also think I saw most of you post in that "What drugs do you do" thread awhile back.....

I'm as far right as one can legally go :thumbup:

I'm just so sick of saying the same shit over and over to a bunch of ignorance retards



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:05 AM.