do they live up to the hype?
#3
My friend Mike traded in a modded 97 ITR for his new S2K, which he's already done a lot to. His words are:
"The Type R was awesome and everything, but the S2K was just the next step up. A different car altogether, more power, RWD means more getting to the ground."
He obviously doesn't regret it.
"The Type R was awesome and everything, but the S2K was just the next step up. A different car altogether, more power, RWD means more getting to the ground."
He obviously doesn't regret it.
#7
"The Type R was awesome and everything, but the S2K was just the next step up. A different car altogether, more power, RWD means more getting to the ground."
As someone who owned and tracked both a ITR and a S2000 at the same time my belief is that overall the ITR is a better and more capable car.
However, I still own the S2000 and don't the ITR. Why? I have a better track car than both now -- and I still enjoy the convertible top of the S2000.
As to the question of "hype" I guess that would have to be better defined before I could comment on it. I will say that the S2000 is not without it's faults (wimpy brakes without better pads, loads of bumpsteer, lots of snap-oversteering tendencies, weak clutches, lot's of driveline lash) -- but it is also a great car to bang around in, very much like a go-kart for the streets, and more often than not it makes me smile.
#8
Originally posted by steve c
However, I still own the S2000 and don't the ITR. Why? I have a better track car than both now -- and I still enjoy the convertible top of the S2000.
However, I still own the S2000 and don't the ITR. Why? I have a better track car than both now -- and I still enjoy the convertible top of the S2000.
#9
The S2K is a better handler than the Boxster S and M Roadster
#10
Originally posted by steve c
Err --- no --- it is not. Handling is a quasi-defined criteria that differs from person to person. Magazine numbers (which I assume you are using for your comparison here) only show part of the picture -- although even if we stick to those the S2000 is better in only some regards and worse in others according to the magazines.
Err --- no --- it is not. Handling is a quasi-defined criteria that differs from person to person. Magazine numbers (which I assume you are using for your comparison here) only show part of the picture -- although even if we stick to those the S2000 is better in only some regards and worse in others according to the magazines.