Notices

do they live up to the hype?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-26-2002 | 08:47 PM
  #1  
VRGNCD5's Avatar
VRGNCD5
Thread Starter
cause it's tight!
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,044
Likes: 0
From: 916
Default do they live up to the hype?

Are you happy w/your s2k? Is it as good a car as you expected? How fast is it and does it handle well?
Old 12-27-2002 | 10:11 AM
  #2  
dundonr's Avatar
dundonr
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

while it's slower than my last "car" (C5 Corvette)it's not bad at all.. Handling is exemplary, and it has plenty of power for anything I want it to do...
Old 12-27-2002 | 10:26 AM
  #3  
ur31337's Avatar
ur31337
Colby
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,150
Likes: 0
From: Southeastern CT
Default

My friend Mike traded in a modded 97 ITR for his new S2K, which he's already done a lot to. His words are:

"The Type R was awesome and everything, but the S2K was just the next step up. A different car altogether, more power, RWD means more getting to the ground."

He obviously doesn't regret it.
Old 12-27-2002 | 02:29 PM
  #4  
HONDA GHANDI's Avatar
HONDA GHANDI
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Arvada, CO
Default

no regrets. most fun car Ive ever had.
Old 12-29-2002 | 04:39 PM
  #5  
The Captain's Avatar
The Captain
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

don't know what hype, but no regrets.
Old 01-25-2003 | 09:00 PM
  #6  
s2ktonv's Avatar
s2ktonv
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,541
Likes: 0
From: Bayarea
Default

Hype? I guess you can say it did, I don't think there are many disappointments with the exception of no low end torque, but after all it still is a 4 banger.
Old 01-29-2003 | 05:33 AM
  #7  
steve c's Avatar
steve c
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

"The Type R was awesome and everything, but the S2K was just the next step up. A different car altogether, more power, RWD means more getting to the ground."
Personally, I would think you have to chock up some of what your friend said to justification of his current car. You see this same habit on most user review websites -- whatever the user currently has is always the best.

As someone who owned and tracked both a ITR and a S2000 at the same time my belief is that overall the ITR is a better and more capable car.

However, I still own the S2000 and don't the ITR. Why? I have a better track car than both now -- and I still enjoy the convertible top of the S2000.

As to the question of "hype" I guess that would have to be better defined before I could comment on it. I will say that the S2000 is not without it's faults (wimpy brakes without better pads, loads of bumpsteer, lots of snap-oversteering tendencies, weak clutches, lot's of driveline lash) -- but it is also a great car to bang around in, very much like a go-kart for the streets, and more often than not it makes me smile.
Old 01-29-2003 | 06:43 AM
  #8  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Originally posted by steve c
However, I still own the S2000 and don't the ITR. Why? I have a better track car than both now -- and I still enjoy the convertible top of the S2000.
What track car is that? The S2K is a better handler than the Boxster S and M Roadster
Old 01-29-2003 | 07:23 AM
  #9  
steve c's Avatar
steve c
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

The S2K is a better handler than the Boxster S and M Roadster
Err --- no --- it is not. Handling is a quasi-defined criteria that differs from person to person. Magazine numbers (which I assume you are using for your comparison here) only show part of the picture -- although even if we stick to those the S2000 is better in only some regards and worse in others according to the magazines.
Old 01-29-2003 | 07:44 AM
  #10  
98CoupeV6's Avatar
98CoupeV6
lots and lots of fail
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 1
From: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Default

Originally posted by steve c
Err --- no --- it is not. Handling is a quasi-defined criteria that differs from person to person. Magazine numbers (which I assume you are using for your comparison here) only show part of the picture -- although even if we stick to those the S2000 is better in only some regards and worse in others according to the magazines.
I use track times from R&T. The S2000 was faster around Buttonwillow (I think that was the track) than both cars and kept tighter lines. They measured it through satellite gps data. I don't use skidpad and lateral g numbers...they are not very telling.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:42 PM.