AEM V2 intake w/ Turbo
07-02-2006, 04:45 PM
#21
On permanent hiatus
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: A forum with actual tech
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by adva7328
i do understand what you are saying but i guarantee that my friend that has a ctr fully built hatch will beat alot of turboed cars he dynoed at 314 which is more that 262 with boost anyday either way turbo or a engine build is better than stock and will take alot of money, time, and knowledge
I want to see dyno sheets. A B16 will never get anywhere near 300 whp N/A. Sorry.
I am not doubting that N/A is fast. They are a completely different monster than a turbo car.
Last edited by Däs Schmoo; 07-02-2006 at 04:49 PM.
07-02-2006, 05:27 PM
#22
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: michigan
Posts: 28,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by adva7328
i do understand what you are saying but i guarantee that my friend that has a ctr fully built hatch will beat alot of turboed cars he dynoed at 314 which is more that 262 with boost anyday either way turbo or a engine build is better than stock and will take alot of money, time, and knowledge
I will also pull out multiple :bs: flags on that right there.
07-09-2006, 01:31 AM
#24
got boost?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by adva7328
i do understand what you are saying but i guarantee that my friend that has a ctr fully built hatch will beat alot of turboed cars he dynoed at 314 which is more that 262 with boost anyday either way turbo or a engine build is better than stock and will take alot of money, time, and knowledge
07-24-2006, 11:22 AM
#26
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A-Town, PA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by crazy
Just to clear the confusion, the RSX V2 is NOT a cold air intake, it is a dual tubed SRI.
For everyother car but the RSX it is a CAI.
For everyother car but the RSX it is a CAI.
Last edited by Fira!; 07-24-2006 at 11:45 AM.
07-24-2006, 12:59 PM
#27
I missed Sean
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
the v2 is nothing but a ploy. the power you gain from it is minimal and it's just really expensive. in certain rpm's you'll actually lose torque over a CAI or SRI.
07-24-2006, 01:45 PM
#28
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: A-Town, PA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sherwood
the v2 is nothing but a ploy. the power you gain from it is minimal and it's just really expensive. in certain rpm's you'll actually lose torque over a CAI or SRI.
07-24-2006, 02:17 PM
#29
I missed Sean
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fairfield/Bridgeport CT
Posts: 11,285
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Fira!
wow... so why would people say its the best intake on the market right now? it was said that it gets better gain than any other cai AEM offers. i dont want to go with an intake just because the manufacturer says its the best. althoug, on the website it has dyno sheets to prove... ??
07-24-2006, 06:50 PM
#30
been there done that
Originally Posted by Fira!
wow... so why would people say its the best intake on the market right now? it was said that it gets better gain than any other cai AEM offers. i dont want to go with an intake just because the manufacturer says its the best. althoug, on the website it has dyno sheets to prove... ??
