2004 Lexus RX330?
12-05-2002, 05:08 AM
#31
chris is the devil
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: so cal 951 + 760
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by zishan
Your numbers don't add up. 2010 is a little over 7 years away. But I have heard that they do want all or most of their new cars to have optional hybrid systems. The rx330 would make sense to be hybrid especially since they are all wheel drive.
Your numbers don't add up. 2010 is a little over 7 years away. But I have heard that they do want all or most of their new cars to have optional hybrid systems. The rx330 would make sense to be hybrid especially since they are all wheel drive.
12-05-2002, 05:03 PM
#33
chris is the devil
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: so cal 951 + 760
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AcuraFanatic
2010 - 2003 = 7-years. I don't think we'll be seeing many hybrids for the Lexus division, but the RX330, being Camry based, may be a candidate.
2010 - 2003 = 7-years. I don't think we'll be seeing many hybrids for the Lexus division, but the RX330, being Camry based, may be a candidate.
12-05-2002, 05:05 PM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually another website posted another article that said the first one was false. The guy who interviewed the Toyota rep took the words out of context. I'm not sure if Toyota issued a press release, but its not true. Maybe its an internal goal or something, but its very unlikely.
12-05-2002, 07:05 PM
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by velfarretokyo
Actually another website posted another article that said the first one was false. The guy who interviewed the Toyota rep took the words out of context. I'm not sure if Toyota issued a press release, but its not true. Maybe its an internal goal or something, but its very unlikely.
Actually another website posted another article that said the first one was false. The guy who interviewed the Toyota rep took the words out of context. I'm not sure if Toyota issued a press release, but its not true. Maybe its an internal goal or something, but its very unlikely.
12-06-2002, 10:29 AM
#36
lots and lots of fail
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeetroit
Posts: 23,004
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally posted by Samson
whatever..... do you not understand that cars dont always come the same yr of the model yr? A 2010 car can arrive and do arrive starting in the fall os 2009 and vice versa, so its about 6-7 yrs. Makes no difference anyway, i dunno why you have to argue it... not even relevant, makes no difference.
whatever..... do you not understand that cars dont always come the same yr of the model yr? A 2010 car can arrive and do arrive starting in the fall os 2009 and vice versa, so its about 6-7 yrs. Makes no difference anyway, i dunno why you have to argue it... not even relevant, makes no difference.
12-06-2002, 10:41 AM
#37
AccordPower24
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by AcuraFanatic
2010 - 2003 = 7-years. I don't think we'll be seeing many hybrids for the Lexus division, but the RX330, being Camry based, may be a candidate.
2010 - 2003 = 7-years. I don't think we'll be seeing many hybrids for the Lexus division, but the RX330, being Camry based, may be a candidate.
12-06-2002, 10:42 AM
#38
AccordPower24
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Samson
whatever..... do you not understand that cars dont always come the same yr of the model yr? A 2010 car can arrive and do arrive starting in the fall os 2009 and vice versa, so its about 6-7 yrs. Makes no difference anyway, i dunno why you have to argue it... not even relevant, makes no difference.
whatever..... do you not understand that cars dont always come the same yr of the model yr? A 2010 car can arrive and do arrive starting in the fall os 2009 and vice versa, so its about 6-7 yrs. Makes no difference anyway, i dunno why you have to argue it... not even relevant, makes no difference.
12-06-2002, 11:46 AM
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Frisco, Texas
Posts: 2,523
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by LuckyDog
If Acura's going to be coming out with a Hybrid AWD vehicle (which we pretty much know is true, just we don't know what form) then I think Toyota is gonna want Lexus to have one.
If Acura's going to be coming out with a Hybrid AWD vehicle (which we pretty much know is true, just we don't know what form) then I think Toyota is gonna want Lexus to have one.
we pretty much think they will, nothing is 100% confirmed. yet........
12-06-2002, 03:42 PM
#40
chris is the devil
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: so cal 951 + 760
Posts: 8,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i clarified and said 6-7 yrs.... ok??? And really, it makes no difference wether its a few months off. And i consider it 2003 thats why. the yr is gone.