Refreshened 2003 Sebring Coupe & Convertible
#11
Originally posted by AnthonyCCORD
rsx-ish headlights :joshers:
rsx-ish headlights :joshers:
I have more criticism about the squarish oversized grill than I do about the headlights. I actually didn't think the previous/current style wasn't that bad. This update is a :down:.
#14
I just noticed how well the Chrysler 300M has aged. It looks better than the newer 2003 Sebring. Granted, most Chryslers age well, but a design like the 300M would still be groundbreaking if rolled out for the MY2003.
#16
The 300M is a very nice looking car. The interior is rather cheap, however, and it is not a good handler.
This car is fugly. Looks like a Concorde that is even fuglier. I liked the old, smooth, conservative design. Nice attempt at a grill, Chrysler
The back SCREAMS Geo Metro.
This car is fugly. Looks like a Concorde that is even fuglier. I liked the old, smooth, conservative design. Nice attempt at a grill, Chrysler
The back SCREAMS Geo Metro.
#18
And oh yeah, the 2003 Dodge Stratus Coupe...
I bet Viper owners love that they're making the Stratus look like the 2003 Viper...
It looks nice until you pick at individual features. The front fascia is waaay too curved. The lower grille is fugly. The side of the front overhang is weirdly styled. Taillights are fugly. Lower rear styling is very plain. Thing on side of car is weird. Rear 3/4 view reveals the back glass goes way too far into roof and it's way too swoopy.
I bet Viper owners love that they're making the Stratus look like the 2003 Viper...
It looks nice until you pick at individual features. The front fascia is waaay too curved. The lower grille is fugly. The side of the front overhang is weirdly styled. Taillights are fugly. Lower rear styling is very plain. Thing on side of car is weird. Rear 3/4 view reveals the back glass goes way too far into roof and it's way too swoopy.