Notices
News & Rumors Archives Useful threads, previous Cars of the Week, and more.

Acura To Debut New MDX Concept At New York International Auto Show

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-28-2006, 07:14 PM
  #21  
Daniel
Senior Member
 
Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 8,232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's some better images.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
07_mdx_front.jpg (197.9 KB, 30 views)
File Type: jpg
07_mdx_rear.jpg (185.9 KB, 31 views)
Old 03-28-2006, 07:24 PM
  #22  
iNteGraz92
forever lurking
 
iNteGraz92's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: El Monte, CA
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Daniel
Here's some better images.
:bowdown: to HAN hookups for big official honda pics
Old 03-28-2006, 07:54 PM
  #23  
Ochdx
Senior Member
 
Ochdx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherDave™
Not to drag this thread off topic, but read up on the E46 330d.

Offered as a sedan and coupe, it turned mid-7s 0-100kph and got 38-45mpg in the process. Not bad at all.

Well, the 330 is anything but a luxury car, and the diesel option I believe is only offered in Europe - but Europe is a whole different world compared to the USA.
Old 03-28-2006, 07:59 PM
  #24  
Ochdx
Senior Member
 
Ochdx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MtViewGuy88
You've got to be kidding.

Look, Mercedes-Benz is pushing its very clean-burning Bluetec turbodiesel technology for the US market (we could see a good fraction M-B models with Bluetec turbodiesel engines as early as 2008!). If you've driven the M-B E320CDI, you know that the car runs very quietly with just about no engine clattering, doesn't have visible smoke from the exhaust and gets way better fuel efficiency than the equivalent gasoline engine! I expect the first Bluetec applications will be the M-series medium SUV, G-series large SUV and R-series "crossover" wagon, with other M-B models getting Bluetec engines further down the road.
Yeah, I'll believe it when I see it, but I predict the diesel equipped MBs will sell poorly in the US, and they are going to be on the bottom of the lineup compared to gasoline engines. Again, this is my opinion based on my previous experience with diesels - they are just nowhere near as smooth as most gasoline engines.

Originally Posted by MtViewGuy88
As such, Honda doesn't want to be left behind in terms of cutting-edge turbodiesel technology. Honda already has excellent experience with the i-CTDi 2.2-liter I-4 turbodiesel engine that has won plaudits in Europe for its power, quietness and clean exhaust; that technology could be adapted for the V-6 engine that will likely find its way into the Acura MDX, Honda Pilot, Honda Ridgeline and later Honda Odyssey.
Dude, thats Europe. Cars in Europe are designed towards economy, not engine performance. Over there you can get a BMW 7 series, fully loaded, yet equipped with a 2.0 diesel engine, and it will get its ass kicked by a geo metro.
Old 03-29-2006, 04:24 AM
  #25  
jaje
HC Racer H5
 
jaje's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: KCK
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ochdx
Dude, thats Europe. Cars in Europe are designed towards economy, not engine performance. Over there you can get a BMW 7 series, fully loaded, yet equipped with a 2.0 diesel engine, and it will get its ass kicked by a geo metro.
just like how the Euro m3 used to get the more powerful engines and the US versions got didn't...Also how an Accord Type R and Civic Type R were sold over there but not here

i don't jive with the Euro cars are only built for economy and not engine performance

IMO Europeans just get more options than we do
Old 03-29-2006, 07:02 AM
  #26  
AcuraFanatic
Senior Member
 
AcuraFanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Southern NH
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ochdx
Diesel doesn't belong in a luxury car/suv in the US market :-|
You really do become more ignorant every day. Modern day automotive diesels aren't the clattering, smog producing diesels of yesterday.
Old 03-29-2006, 07:15 AM
  #27  
MtViewGuy88
Hopeful FIT owner
 
MtViewGuy88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ochdx
Yeah, I'll believe it when I see it, but I predict the diesel equipped MBs will sell poorly in the US, and they are going to be on the bottom of the lineup compared to gasoline engines. Again, this is my opinion based on my previous experience with diesels - they are just nowhere near as smooth as most gasoline engines.
I think most Europeans will strongly disagree with you. The Mercedes-Benz and BMW models powered by turbodiesel engines have reviewers strongly laud the quiet operation, strong performance, no visible exhaust smoke (thanks to particulate filters), and very good fuel economy. That's why the fastest-selling versions of the BMW E90 3-Series in Europe are the 320d and 330d turbodiesel models. In the 45 states in the USA where the M-B E320CDI is legal, drivers love the car because of its very modern turbodiesel engine.

Originally Posted by Ochdx
Dude, thats Europe. Cars in Europe are designed towards economy, not engine performance. Over there you can get a BMW 7 series, fully loaded, yet equipped with a 2.0 diesel engine, and it will get its ass kicked by a geo metro.
Actually, the smallest diesel engine you can get on the 7-Series is the 3-liter I-6 turbodiesel, which has actually just as much maximum torque as the 4.8-liter gasoline engine! The 7-Series in Europe also includes a more powerful 745d with an engine rated at 329 ps and a incredibly high torque peak. The 745d is probably faster than the 750i and could probably challenge the 760i V-12 sedan in mid-range acceleration.

The fact that today's diesel engines no longer have the performance deficits compared to equivalent gasoline engines, not to mention the lack of diesel clatter and the elimination of visible exhaust smoke are good reasons why not only Mercedes-Benz is pushing forward selling turbodiesel cars here in the USA, but also Honda is building its V-6 turbodiesel and (very likely) BMW will bring their turbodiesels to the USA market.

Last edited by MtViewGuy88; 03-29-2006 at 07:22 AM. Reason: correct spelling and add information
Old 03-29-2006, 08:57 AM
  #28  
jaje
HC Racer H5
 
jaje's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: KCK
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MtViewGuy88
The fact that today's diesel engines no longer have the performance deficits compared to equivalent gasoline engines, not to mention the lack of diesel clatter and the elimination of visible exhaust smoke are good reasons why not only Mercedes-Benz is pushing forward selling turbodiesel cars here in the USA, but also Honda is building its V-6 turbodiesel and (very likely) BMW will bring their turbodiesels to the USA market.
i agree that diesel engines are much better than their lower technology ancestors but they still don't make the power and performance a gasoline engine does

reason being is standard equipment on diesels today are turbochargers giving them a huge advantage of forced induction when compared to n/a gasoline engines
Old 03-29-2006, 09:02 AM
  #29  
mayonaise
Senior Member
 
mayonaise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 3,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AF
You really do become more ignorant every day. Modern day automotive diesels aren't the clattering, smog producing diesels of yesterday.
people are afraid of what they do not understand, and aren't eager to give things a second chance. americans are especially adverse to accepting new technologies and ideas when they're already nicely settled into their outdated ruts. a lot of good ideas fail to catch on in this country, even if it could benefit us dramatically.

Originally Posted by Ochdx
Again, this is my opinion based on my previous experience with diesels - they are just nowhere near as smooth as most gasoline engines.
what is your previous experience with diesels? trucks, buses and 20 year old diesel powered cars? modern diesel engines combined with modern refining techniques are producing diesel-burning engines that run cleaner, smoother, more efficiently, and with more power AND torque than thier gasoline counterparts. there's a pretty good reason why every major european manufacturer offers a good lineup of diesel engines, and they're extremely popular. even honda, champion of environmental-friendliness and smooth/reliable/efficient engines, has developed one. i'm sure mtviewguy can give much more detailed information..

Originally Posted by Ochdx
Over there you can get a BMW 7 series, fully loaded, yet equipped with a 2.0 diesel engine, and it will get its ass kicked by a geo metro.
that's an interesting assertion. care to provide some specs to support that claim?
Old 03-30-2006, 01:06 AM
  #30  
Schneegz
Member
 
Schneegz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bamberg, Germany
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's humorous reading the debates that go on concerning Diesel engines on this and other boards. There is always one camp that dispises Diesels, and one camp that practically worships them, holding them as the Holy Grail of automotive technology that sophisticated Europeans have discovered, and, if only ignorant Americans would get on board, the world would be a better place.

I'm an American living in Europe. Bamberg, Germany, to be exact. I've driven a BMW 5-series Diesel. I rented it last year when I first moved here. It was brand new, with only a few miles on the odometer. I also drive among dozens, if not hundreds, of European Diesel engine cars every day, some new, some old.

Guess what?
1. The new ones still rattle.
2. The new ones still smoke.
3. The new ones still stink.

All these annoyances have been greatly reduced compared with Diesels of yesteryear. For example, I couldn't hear the BMW's engine when I drove it with the windows up. I could only hear it with the windows rolled down. I don't mind the Diesel rattle, but others do, and that BMW Diesel did NOT have the melifluous sound of a gasoline BMW I-6, not by a LONG shot. Other than that, it was smooth, comfortable, and sporty enough to be enjoyable to drive.

Driving behind many a brand new Audi, BMW, VW and Mercedes Diesel I've noticed that, when they start from a stop sign or stop light, and when they downshift on a slow corner, or going uphill, they belch out a puff of black smoke. Again, a huge improvement over the Diesels of the past, but still not as clean as a modern gasoline engine. This should come as no surprise.

Another issue I noticed driving behind European Diesels. They still stink. Even inside my car (now a Euro-spec, 1999 gasoline Ford Mondeo) with the windows rolled up, I can still detect the unmistakeable scent of Diesel fumes eminating from the tail pipes of even the newest European wunderDiesels.

Also, keep in mind that European governments keep Diesel prices artificially lower than gasoline prices by taxing gasoline at much higher percentages than Diesel, which makes Diesel cars more popular here. US Federal and State governments don't do that, so Diesel prices in the US are typically higher than gasoline prices due to supply and demand issues.

Will Mercedes' Bluetec eliminate the smoke and the smell? I don't know, I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Will Diesels sell in the US? I think they will. I'd buy one. I'd love it if my Toyota 4Runner back home had a modern TurboDiesel.

And that's where manufacturers should start reintroducing Diesels, in bigger vehicles like SUVs. I think the people who drive SUVs, pickups and even minivans would be more receptive to a Diesel engine than, say, someone shopping for a compact sedan, or a luxury sedan.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:33 PM.