Originally posted by DVPGSR 94UhkorGuy First let me say that I like the exterior of the Camry a lot. The interior though does look too much like an american car...I am sorry you cannot see the resemblances. AS for younger people buying accords vs camrys there are more younger people in accords, modding them, etc, than i see camrys. How big is the aftermarket for camry's...hrmmm wonder why? And you sir...Have a nice day:wavey: |
Originally posted by 94UhkorGuy And you, have a GREAT day!! |
Originally posted by 94UhkorGuy Ok, i do not want to continue with this. I do not agree with you, and you are not going to convince me. I do not want to convince you of anything, this has gone on too long, and quite frankly, im sick and tired of you. Yes they may look similar, the materials etc are all inferior in quality as well as everything else. Most cars are designed simialr, gauges on the left, radio in center, hvac vents across. So yes, they should look similar. If you have time to go browsing the web for pics of different buick etc... interiors, good or you, but i do not. So, thanks for your views of things, and have a great day! Oh, and just to get the facts straight, according to Demographics, the average age of an Accord owner(viewed as aimed towards younger buyers according to you) is 55(senior)no not in high school, and the average age of a Camry owner is 53. So as for your comment on the Camry's layout as being made for OLDER CUSTOMERS, those older customers are buying the accord, and younger buyers are buying the Camry. :rolleyes: Popular Mechanics Owners Report - Toyota Camry Age Distribution: Under 30 - 7.2% 30-49 - 37.8 50-plus - 55.0 Popular Mechanics Owners Report - Honda Accord Age Distribution: Under 30 - 17.3% 30-49 - 38.1 50-plus - 44.6 :eek: Look at the Under 30 category!!!! :thumbup: |
Originally posted by kazi You who complains about EVERYTHING in the Accord. You complain about Honda catering LESS than 10% of the Accord to customers who wants an affordable barebone car with the DX trim. Then you complain about 240HP. Then when someone proves you wrong, you go flame them and use childish name calling or reply with "your momma" insults. And now you're trying to through out some pity? :rofl: Seriously, you're "sick and tired" of me comment really put a BIG SMILE on my face and makes me laugh my ass off. That's what I said. The LAYOUT of the CAMRY's interior is SIMILAR to the BUICK. I never mentioned anything about quality difference. The point of my statement was Camry is obviously made to cater older customers that shops for BUICKs than they are for the Accord, Altima, or Passat. Even the fricking slushy handling is like a Buick. Please provide your source. I'll throw my source in: Popular Mechanics Owners Report - Toyota Camry Age Distribution: Under 30 - 7.2% 30-49 - 37.8 50-plus - 55.0 Popular Mechanics Owners Report - Honda Accord Age Distribution: Under 30 - 17.3% 30-49 - 38.1 50-plus - 44.6 :eek: Look at the Under 30 category!!!! :thumbup: http://carpoint.msn.com/vip/heraudsp...=10143&src=vip http://carpoint.msn.com/vip/heraudsp...=10158&src=vip |
Ok, I know I'm just a newbie around here, but I do know cars. Who cares what 94UhkorGuy thinks?!? He's allowed to have his opinion, although I agree his way of presenting it is rather irritating.
I'm confident that when the test results come out the Accord will once again be best or near the top in its class in nearly all areas except maybe styling. Lets face it, with a mushy suspension and less than 200hp the Camry is no threat to the Accord. At least not in the eyes of those who value performance like me and I'm sure most other forum members. My personal opinion is that in this general price range the only other cars worth considering are the Passat and Altima, but I may be biased since I currently own a Passat. |
Originally posted by 94UhkorGuy You have great so-called statistics. Those are from a survey, and surveys ask people, and Demographics are facts. Mine were actual facts, not an owner survey. http://carpoint.msn.com/vip/heraudsp...=10143&src=vip http://carpoint.msn.com/vip/heraudsp...=10158&src=vip Anyway....look whos talking, you like & own a Saturn. You must like the Domestic interiors then?:rolleyes: :madfawk:: Oh, and one more thing, try getting some up-to-date statistics. Those are from 97. That would mean it was based on the 5th gen. |
Honda
Number of Dealers In USA 956 Sales on the U.S. Market Model 1999 2000 % Change Accord 404,192 404,515 % 432 Accords sold per dealer. My stat! Toyota Number of Dealers In USA 1,194 Sales on the U.S. Market Model 1999 2000 % Change Camry 448,162 422,961 -6% 354 Camrys sold per dealer. My stat again! Even with fleet sales the Camry still went down...while % wise the Accord stayed the same they were selling more than the previous year. At least it is positive. Honda also sells more Accords per dealer than Toyota sells Camrys. Thanks for the links they provided me with useful information. |
Originally posted by jwaters Lets face it, with a mushy suspension and less than 200hp the Camry is no threat to the Accord. At least not in the eyes of those who value performance like me and I'm sure most other forum members. |
Originally posted by kazi At least my stats are based fair instead of comparing a new model to a 5 year old model. :fawk: |
Originally posted by 94UhkorGuy how can i be anti-accord if i own one? and am satisfied with it. Everything ive said has been my personal opinion, and you have had to argue with it the whole time. |
I definatley agree that the Altima is outclassed when it comes to interior fit, finish, and materials. Nissan's stongpoint in my opinion has always been their engineering and not design/ergonomics. Meaning that while they're capable of producing some of the best performance cars out there (GT-R, Silvia, Z), they really struggle when it comes to creating a simple family sedan.
To me the new Altima only proves this point further, it's like they said to themselves while designing it, "Okay, instead of trying to focus on ergonomics and interior materials, which we're not very good at doing, let's instead focus on the mechanics and performance since those are our company's strengths." If that really was what Nissan was thinking then the surely accomplished their goal, no other family car in it's price range comes close to it in terms of performance. But by taking this path they alienated a lot of their potential customer base, the majority of family car buyers aren't looking for performance, they're looking for comfort and ergonomics. Maybe they knew this, afterall isn't their new company slogan 'We create cars that are everything to some people, not something for everyone'. The Altima certainly fits that statement, for the few people out there who want great performance but for whatever reason need to buy a family sedan the Altima is the perfect choice. For everyone else looking for more traditional family car values there's the Accord and Camry. I think what Nissan ended up doing probably worked out best for them. They really wouldn't have been able to seriously compete with the Camry or Accord by creating a similarly comfortable and quiet family car with a nice interior. This is because most Camry and Accord buyers don't even shop around, they're repeat buyers who have owned a Camry or Accord in the past and were satisfied with their car so that's what they puchase again. |
Originally posted by The Apple I definatley agree that the Altima is outclassed when it comes to interior fit, finish, and materials. Nissan's stongpoint in my opinion has always been their engineering and not design/ergonomics. Meaning that while they're capable of producing some of the best performance cars out there (GT-R, Silvia, Z), they really struggle when it comes to creating a simple family sedan. To me the new Altima only proves this point further, it's like they said to themselves while designing it, "Okay, instead of trying to focus on ergonomics and interior materials, which we're not very good at doing, let's instead focus on the mechanics and performance since those are our company's strengths." If that really was what Nissan was thinking then the surely accomplished their goal, no other family car in it's price range comes close to it in terms of performance. But by taking this path they alienated a lot of their potential customer base, the majority of family car buyers aren't looking for performance, they're looking for comfort and ergonomics. Maybe they knew this, afterall isn't their new company slogan 'We create cars that are everything to some people, not something for everyone'. The Altima certainly fits that statement, for the few people out there who want great performance but for whatever reason need to buy a family sedan the Altima is the perfect choice. For everyone else looking for more traditional family car values there's the Accord and Camry. I think what Nissan ended up doing probably worked out best for them. They really wouldn't have been able to seriously compete with the Camry or Accord by creating a similarly comfortable and quiet family car with a nice interior. This is because most Camry and Accord buyers don't even shop around, they're repeat buyers who have owned a Camry or Accord in the past and were satisfied with their car so that's what they puchase again. |
94UhkorGuy and kazi, yall did get kind of carried away here. PM each other or talk on aim or something. You both turned your post in to personal ones that had nothing to do witht he Accord kick ass interior :fawk:
|
Originally posted by 94UhkorGuy you are acting like an idiot. Do you have AIM? |
These pictures are from this article but the website is really slow. There are quite a few more images you can check out, but these pictures really make the sedan look better. I really like how it looks in these 3 pics.
http://www.jrlweb.com/images/accords...ntside-900.jpg http://www.jrlweb.com/images/accords...arside-900.jpg http://www.jrlweb.com/images/Accord_Sedan_02.jpg |
Dyno's comparing the current 2.3L 150hp VTEC i4 (grey) to the 2.4L 160hp i-VTEC i4 (black):
http://osx.wieck.com/pv/WKA/2002/07/...2948057_pv.jpg Dyno's comparing the current 3.0L 200hp VTEC V6 (grey) to the 3.0L 240hp i-VTEC V6 (black): http://osx.wieck.com/pv/WKA/2002/07/...2948039_pv.jpg |
Can someone use the photoshop to change the color of the sedan to black please. I want to see how it looks in dark color. If possible, change it to gun metal color also. Thanks!!! ;)
|
I dont like that color Honda chose to show off the Accord in, a dark blue or red would have been much nicer.
|
Originally posted by Xcivic These pictures are from this article but the website is really slow. There are quite a few more images you can check out, but these pictures really make the sedan look better. I really like how it looks in these 3 pics. It said, "5-speed auto in V6 different from 5-speed auto in 4-cylinder, V6 auto same as Acura 3.2 TL" :thumbup: |
Originally posted by kazi Dyno's comparing the current 2.3L 150hp VTEC i4 (grey) to the 2.4L 160hp i-VTEC i4 (black): Dyno's comparing the current 3.0L 200hp VTEC V6 (grey) to the 3.0L 240hp i-VTEC V6 (black): I wonder how where they pulled all that torque from in the J30 though...And also, I was expecting the dyno of the K24 to be way more linear. |
Originally posted by 94UhkorGuy Ah, considering 70% of both Camry and Accord buyers opt for the 4cyl.... i highly doubt they buy a car for performance. |
Originally posted by fastball Don't be surprised if that number decreases to 60/40 or closer..... whith the return of a man. trans. V-6 for Honda in the Acura CL-S, they can't keep those cars in stock. Now, the Accord is gonna be five grand cheaper, a more rigid frame and construction than the CL-S, which is based on the '02 Accord, and an even better level of refinement and quality. I think it may come to a point that either Honda can't keep up with demand for the EX V6 stick, or they will be forced in to making more than they want to. Sound like this will definitely be higher production than the CL-S, anyway. Man, I can't wait! Anyway, here is the golden question, will the 6-Speed have a LSD, I guess not since non on the magazine reviews have said anything about it. |
http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/1...tupict.500.jpg
I agree with u on the some of the material quality of the Altima but the ergonomics don't get any better. Accord interior from pics look very nice and I can't wait to see it in person. http://www.familycar.com/RoadTests/N...ages/Dash2.jpg |
Originally posted by DVPGSR Is that wood stock or aftermarket...it looks decent but the radio, layout of dash, and gagues still looks bad. The gauge layout is perfect http://www.familycar.com/RoadTests/N...es/Cluster.jpg |
Originally posted by KV_ The gauge layout is perfect that is spaced well and everything, but I like the speedo and tach to be the same size, both as center as possible, as in VW/Audi's and BMW's. Like this http://www.northstarbmw.org/images/o...3_-_Gauges.jpg |
Originally posted by KV_ The gauge layout is perfect From what I've heard, the 7th gen Accords has a Lexus like instrument panel that mimics the lighting of a Mercedes and Lexus. :thumbup: |
Originally posted by yianni64 that is spaced well and everything, but I like the speedo and tach to be the same size, both as center as possible, as in VW/Audi's and BMW's. Like this http://www.northstarbmw.org/images/o...3_-_Gauges.jpg |
la la la... coupe with a spoiler anyone? :)
|
I just noticed something. The hoodline and top of the front fenders of the Accord looks VERY similar to the S2000 with that V angles, like this: \_/ .
http://osx.wieck.com/pv/WKA/2002/07/...3036916_pv.jpg http://www2.gol.com/users/motors/showroom/S2000.jpg I think with that angle of the Accord, the Accord's fenders might be more pronounced and stronger in looks than the current 6th gen styling. I have a hunch it looks better in person than in pictures. :eek: |
If you ask me, they shoulda made it look even more like the S2000, especially the coupe. The S2000 is Honda's flagship car in many ways, and a strong resemblense to it can only do good. 6-Speed with 240hp, kinda sounds familiar if u know what im saying. Too bad its FWD ;)
|
Originally posted by DVPGSR That is the best layout for a dash and is copied by many other car manufacturers. It is typical to European car manufacturers and is where it started. |
Originally posted by iNteGraz92 my car has a tach and speedo that are the same size w/ gas and temp gauges to the side. is it euro? :D It is European inspired but not european made. |
fugly:p
Accord interior is very nice and well put together:D |
Originally posted by iNteGraz92 my car has a tach and speedo that are the same size w/ gas and temp gauges to the side. is it euro? :D "Look at our new Euro signals!" ugh |
Now exporting.
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...5.jpg.orig.jpg
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...c.jpg.orig.jpg It witnessed it in the Chiba Prefecture Narashino City the other day. For the United States and Asia LX. :eek:http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...1.jpg.orig.jpg |
Re: Now exporting.
Originally posted by kanto-parts.com http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...5/fd6f9345.jpg http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...1/fd6f933c.jpg It witnessed it in the Chiba Prefecture Narashino City the other day. For the United States and Asia LX. :eek:http://www.imagestation.com/picture/...6/fd6f9341.jpg |
Re: Re: Now exporting.
Originally posted by yianni64 I'm confused. These pics were taken in Japan? Isnt the JDM accord different than the US version? |
yianni64,kazi.
This photograph is near the port it is in Tokyo Bay in Japan. Export equipment of Honda hereA part of USDM was made in the Sayama factory. Might the amount for which production is not in time in the United States. JDM and Europe are common models in a next Gen accord. The United States and Southeast Asia are common models. As for JDM and a European model, the size is small and the design is also different.
Thanks:thumbup: |
Re: Re: Now exporting.
Originally posted by yianni64 I'm confused. These pics were taken in Japan? Isnt the JDM accord different than the US version? |
Look at the third picture..... the yellow banner on the top deck of the truck written in Japanese seems a little digitaly enhanced, if you know what I mean, since it does not appear it the other two.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:31 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands