What do you guys think about this setup
#13
thanks everyone. the reason why i chosed 89mm is cause i want a little more torgue like i currently have with my LS. I was thinking about bigger but then reliability becomes an issue. I was told 95mm are great but only for the track and stuff. what size crank do you think i should get if not a 89mm DB7?
#15
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: eL Lay, SoCal
Posts: 18,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 2000 LS/VTEC
thanks everyone. the reason why i chosed 89mm is cause i want a little more torgue like i currently have with my LS. I was thinking about bigger but then reliability becomes an issue. I was told 95mm are great but only for the track and stuff. what size crank do you think i should get if not a 89mm DB7?
thanks everyone. the reason why i chosed 89mm is cause i want a little more torgue like i currently have with my LS. I was thinking about bigger but then reliability becomes an issue. I was told 95mm are great but only for the track and stuff. what size crank do you think i should get if not a 89mm DB7?
thats just my personal preference tho. i dont believe in stroking out honda engines. id rather have a tight stroke and a bigger bore.... but then again, i also care less about low end driveability
#16
yeah i'm definatly getting arp rod bolts and head bolts. i don't believe in stroking honda motors myself, that's why i decided to stay with a ls stroke. i'm pretty sure that a 89mm crank could handle 9k revs, my stock ls does about 9200 right now. would you think that a stock gsr crank be more reliable in the long run?