Notices

SiR (B16A) vs. GSR (B18?) Engine

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-09-2002 | 08:17 AM
  #11  
Shingoblade-GSR's Avatar
Shingoblade-GSR
Hellsing Agency
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by eclipse spanker
I agree.....B16 is inferior to our B18s, but the engine does have some balls.
The b16a head actually flows better as well...if I'm not mistaken it's used on the B18C5

Shingo
Old 11-09-2002 | 09:11 AM
  #12  
dom93hatch's Avatar
dom93hatch
more meat, more fire
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 28,251
Likes: 0
From: Orange, CA
Default

Originally posted by Shingoblade-GSR
The b16a head actually flows better as well...if I'm not mistaken it's used on the B18C5

Shingo
B18C5 head = mildly ported B16A head Good for top end power. The B18C1 head works better in the midrange. The 2-stage intake manifold helps as well.
Old 11-09-2002 | 10:32 AM
  #13  
dubcac's Avatar
dubcac
I
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,525
Likes: 0
From: Westside til I die
Default

Originally posted by Shingoblade-GSR
The b16a head actually flows better as well...if I'm not mistaken it's used on the B18C5

Shingo

This is a myth. They flow almost identically to the GSR head, and with more volume of air the GSR actually flows better.


Old 11-09-2002 | 01:07 PM
  #14  
DB7 2.0's Avatar
DB7 2.0
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,043
Likes: 0
From: eL Lay, SoCal
Default

werd
Old 11-09-2002 | 01:43 PM
  #15  
MrFatbooty's Avatar
MrFatbooty
Wannabe yuppie
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 25,918
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
Default

Oh lord.

The B16A/B17A (PR3) head and B18C1 (P72) heads flow almost identically. The biggest differernce at any point on that graph is ~2.5 CFM which is completely insignifigant.

The PR3 head has a higher combustion chamber volume. This means that it provides a slightly lower compression ratio than the P72 head. Similarly, the Type-R motors use a hand-ported version of the PR3 head with their own intake manifold. The larger combustion chambers mean a larger surface area which in turn makes the head a bit easier to repeat the same port job over a production line. One could also argue that the PR3 head provides more generous "squish" area for high-CR running.

If you put a Type-R PR3 head on a flow bench I guarantee it would produce noticeably better numbers than a PR3 off a B16A or B17A.

Now I swear that I've typed this exact reply in any number of threads, even down to responding to dubster99's freakin flow bench graph. Geez people, yall aren't very creative at ALL.
Old 11-09-2002 | 06:11 PM
  #16  
dubcac's Avatar
dubcac
I
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 56,525
Likes: 0
From: Westside til I die
Default

Yeah, I could have sworn I've put up this graph more than once to prove the b16 head doesn't flow better than the GSR....
Old 11-09-2002 | 10:26 PM
  #17  
Shingoblade-GSR's Avatar
Shingoblade-GSR
Hellsing Agency
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by dubster99
Yeah, I could have sworn I've put up this graph more than once to prove the b16 head doesn't flow better than the GSR....
Whoops

I probably should've have mentioned "hand-ported b16a head on the b18c5".

My bad. Apologies for bringing up an old myth

Shingo
Old 11-10-2002 | 04:35 AM
  #18  
TheRooster's Avatar
TheRooster
Former Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Oakland
Default

I'll whip out the old "no replacement for displacement" argument. No matter what you're going to do with an engine, more displacement is a good thing (especially when you're comparing two engines that are virtually identical).
Old 11-11-2002 | 05:41 PM
  #19  
sir_crx's Avatar
sir_crx
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Cochran, GA
Default

okay, been gone for a while (like u missed me )
99-00 Civic Si 2612 lbs 15.7 1/4 mile stock
94-98 Teg LS 2643 lbs 16.1 1/4 mile stock
94-98 Teg GSR 2671 lbs 15.5 1/4 mile stock
Those Integras are HEAVY let me tell you...ANYONE thinking of putting a B16A into a HEAVY ASS Teg is stupid. 30lbs, gimme a break, I'll go run around the block for a few weeks, after looking at the curb weights everyone can eat me! All I've heard is how damn heavy an LS is and how slow it's going to be, BS. I'll do the swap, eventually get some times, and prove I'll make this sucka work!
Old 11-11-2002 | 06:24 PM
  #20  
Shingoblade-GSR's Avatar
Shingoblade-GSR
Hellsing Agency
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,561
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by sir_crx
okay, been gone for a while (like u missed me )
99-00 Civic Si 2612 lbs 15.7 1/4 mile stock
94-98 Teg LS 2643 lbs 16.1 1/4 mile stock
94-98 Teg GSR 2671 lbs 15.5 1/4 mile stock
Those Integras are HEAVY let me tell you...ANYONE thinking of putting a B16A into a HEAVY ASS Teg is stupid. 30lbs, gimme a break, I'll go run around the block for a few weeks, after looking at the curb weights everyone can eat me! All I've heard is how damn heavy an LS is and how slow it's going to be, BS. I'll do the swap, eventually get some times, and prove I'll make this sucka work!
So you're saying integras are not heavy?

If you are (and correct me if I'm wrong), I think you're making the wrong comparisons. Dig up some curb weight info on a civic hatch si/hx/etc. and see what you come up with. I guarantee the integra will look like porky the pig.

Shingo



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:15 AM.