Greddy Turbo Re-Tuned
03-15-2005 | 01:46 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Greddy Turbo Re-Tuned
Numbers with Greddy Turbo, Greddy exhaust, 2.5 inlet/outlet high-flow cat, ACT HDSS, tuned with the crappy blue box. Apparently this setup was running pretty lean.
216 whp
157 torque
Ran a 13.957 @ 102.01 mph on street tires.
Picked up some RC 550 injectors, converted to OBD1, and went with Uberdata (basically Hondata).
210 whp
165 torque
Didn't get a chance to run this at the track but I would assume it would be about the same. I was a little suprised I lost horsepower but the A/F was mid 13's to mid-high 12's which is safe enough for my daily driver.
Just got my car back an hour ago with my A/F dropped to the mid 12's and the weather was in the 50's.
231 whp
181 torque
edit: This was on 10lbs. I actually don't have a boost controller, it's just what the internal wastegate lets pass through. I wanted to set it at 10lbs but when we saw it was sticking right inbetween 9 and 10lbs, we decided that I wouldn't need a boost controller.
I'm pretty pleased with this since the engine is stock with 107k miles. Now keep in mind these numbers were on a mustang dyno, add 10-15% and you will get the numbers on a dynojet. All questions/comments are welcome. Here are 2 pics for fun
216 whp
157 torque
Ran a 13.957 @ 102.01 mph on street tires.
Picked up some RC 550 injectors, converted to OBD1, and went with Uberdata (basically Hondata).
210 whp
165 torque
Didn't get a chance to run this at the track but I would assume it would be about the same. I was a little suprised I lost horsepower but the A/F was mid 13's to mid-high 12's which is safe enough for my daily driver.
Just got my car back an hour ago with my A/F dropped to the mid 12's and the weather was in the 50's.
231 whp
181 torque
edit: This was on 10lbs. I actually don't have a boost controller, it's just what the internal wastegate lets pass through. I wanted to set it at 10lbs but when we saw it was sticking right inbetween 9 and 10lbs, we decided that I wouldn't need a boost controller.
I'm pretty pleased with this since the engine is stock with 107k miles. Now keep in mind these numbers were on a mustang dyno, add 10-15% and you will get the numbers on a dynojet. All questions/comments are welcome. Here are 2 pics for fun
. 
03-15-2005 | 06:22 PM
#4
Moderator
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 0
From: Philly & MD
That second picture is real cool. Good numbers dude!
Dont go thinking that 10-15% is real though, thats not always the case. Dynos can be calibrated to read what they read. The only way to know for sure is to compare the same time, temperature, setup, etc dyno to dyno.
Dont go thinking that 10-15% is real though, thats not always the case. Dynos can be calibrated to read what they read. The only way to know for sure is to compare the same time, temperature, setup, etc dyno to dyno.
03-16-2005 | 06:05 AM
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,556
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
I dont have side markers, i think you mean bumper lenses? If so, I got mine from www.autosonic.com . They cost $59. Just go under Acura, then Integra and they are at the bottom.
03-16-2005 | 06:54 AM
#7
Apathy Kills
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 60,714
Likes: 0
From: The Left Lane
Looking good, both aesthetically and power-wise. :thumbup:
__________________
:: :ToDspin: - supermod - but who gives a shit?
:: HAN Integra FAQ: If, by some miracle, yours hasn't been stolen... check it out!
:: HAN Integra FAQ: If, by some miracle, yours hasn't been stolen... check it out!
03-16-2005 | 05:56 PM
#10
On permanent hiatus
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,716
Likes: 0
From: A forum with actual tech
Originally Posted by kfar09
I dont have side markers, i think you mean bumper lenses? If so, I got mine from www.autosonic.com . They cost $59. Just go under Acura, then Integra and they are at the bottom.