SMSP vs. Stock ITR B18C6 EUDM ITR dyno comparison *dyno plots, video* (56k)
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SMSP vs. Stock ITR B18C6 EUDM ITR dyno comparison *dyno plots, video* (56k)
The dyno used is a bosche dyno. The power is given in kW the conversion is kW x 1.36 = hp .
The first dyno run is a stock ITR B18C6 motor, 4-2-1 jdm header, 11.1:1 compression (EUDM ITR...) and I had the AEM underdrive pulley kit installed...
Ploted at 97 degrees.
Max horsepower at the flywheel: 1.36 x 144kW = 194.6 hp
Second dyno run with, smsp header, highflow cat (smsp), magnaflow catback (smsp). There was a comptech icebox added but with the stock airfilter.
Ploted at 77 degrees.
Max horsepower at the flywheel: 1.36 x 151.4 = 205.9 hp
Comparison charts:
Red - Stock
Blue - Modded
Torque.
Red - stock
Blue - modded
The feeling between stock and the I/H/E cat is there. The torque difference is felt. The power difference is definetly felt. I also get 3rd gear chirp sometimes!!! I honestly was expecting a higher peak value but the overall hp and torque gain is very impressive. Tell me what you think.
If you want to see the parts on the car>
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=864635
And for the vid of the stock dyno run video:
http://s2.yousendit.com/d.aspx...0C612
The first dyno run is a stock ITR B18C6 motor, 4-2-1 jdm header, 11.1:1 compression (EUDM ITR...) and I had the AEM underdrive pulley kit installed...
Ploted at 97 degrees.
Max horsepower at the flywheel: 1.36 x 144kW = 194.6 hp
Second dyno run with, smsp header, highflow cat (smsp), magnaflow catback (smsp). There was a comptech icebox added but with the stock airfilter.
Ploted at 77 degrees.
Max horsepower at the flywheel: 1.36 x 151.4 = 205.9 hp
Comparison charts:
Red - Stock
Blue - Modded
Torque.
Red - stock
Blue - modded
The feeling between stock and the I/H/E cat is there. The torque difference is felt. The power difference is definetly felt. I also get 3rd gear chirp sometimes!!! I honestly was expecting a higher peak value but the overall hp and torque gain is very impressive. Tell me what you think.
If you want to see the parts on the car>
http://www.honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=864635
And for the vid of the stock dyno run video:
http://s2.yousendit.com/d.aspx...0C612
#2
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Second dyno run video:
http://s2.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=B3...2F4626B54C5D21
And a run I did against another ITR. My ITR vs. his 18" rims, intake and emptied. When I raced him with me being stock we ran the same times.
Video of the race:
http://s11.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=7...38BEA69B24F962
http://s2.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=B3...2F4626B54C5D21
And a run I did against another ITR. My ITR vs. his 18" rims, intake and emptied. When I raced him with me being stock we ran the same times.
Video of the race:
http://s11.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=7...38BEA69B24F962
#5
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for motor and transmission changes I'll be doing in the next few months. Up next is clutch flywheel cams and AEM EMS. Then Ill be puting in CTR pistons with crower rods and up the rev limitter to where she wants to be. I don't know if it's worth uping the compression because Im already at 11.1:1. I also want to do a port and posish job on the head, but to find someone that is promissingly good for head work like that is hard to find and trust. I might also sleeve the block. This is all very general and have rough ideas on what I'll do soon. But I'm going to take my time to make sure the set up is what is the best for what I'm looking for. All of this will be done in about a years time...
#7
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I prefer having a complete change instead of an add on. Also, I know two people that are having their hondas tuned at the same tuner with the AEM EMS. I believe it would be easier because the tuner will have more experience with the software.