Dynoed my GSR motor
Nice #'s
02-24-2004 | 01:59 AM
#13
sound/acoustical engineer
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO & Chicago, IL
Numbers are good for what it has. When my 95 GSR hit 100k miles, I put down 160 whp and 120 lb. tq...w/only an intake. So, I believe those numbers are possible. Can you post a chart, I'd like to see the curve since that is more important.
02-24-2004 | 05:04 AM
#14
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
This is the best i can do since the viewer i use doesnt allow me to save the whole picture, i can take a picture of the screen.
Originally Posted by cheezthis
Numbers are good for what it has. When my 95 GSR hit 100k miles, I put down 160 whp and 120 lb. tq...w/only an intake. So, I believe those numbers are possible. Can you post a chart, I'd like to see the curve since that is more important.
02-24-2004 | 06:04 AM
#15
snitches get stitches
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 49,696
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by SuperStar19
This is the best i can do since the viewer i use doesnt allow me to save the whole picture, i can take a picture of the screen.
fairly consistant powerband all the way through...kinda suprising you don't even see any sort of spike when you hit vtec though :thinking:
02-24-2004 | 06:31 AM
#16
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RB
fairly consistant powerband all the way through...kinda suprising you don't even see any sort of spike when you hit vtec though :thinking:
You can't tell cause there is no axis label either place. That could be 6000-8000 rpms only. If you can take a screen shot (alt+prtin screen) then you can post a file of the whole thing. If you have the dyno run files you can pull down the dynojet viewer and overlay any run you like.
160 with an Intake only is just about an absurd statement. A GSR on a dynojet stock makes about 140 whp. That is a modest 18% drivetrain loss. Figure 10 whp from an Intake (CAI: AEM, Iceman . . ) then you get to 150. To get 160 at the wheels you would have to be making 25 more hp than stock at the crank off just an intake. Like I said above unlikely. Tune maybe but still unlikely. I have seen some Type-Rs make only 163-164 with an Intake.
One thing to make clear is what type of Dyno you ran on. A DynoJet and Dynapack run MUCH higher numbers while a Mustang Dyno will show much lower numbers. This means nothing except that the numbers are not comparable. Most people speak in Dynojet numbers so if you dyno'd on something else that info woudl help.
02-24-2004 | 06:58 AM
#17
sound/acoustical engineer
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO & Chicago, IL
Originally Posted by Asahi
You can't tell cause there is no axis label either place. That could be 6000-8000 rpms only. If you can take a screen shot (alt+prtin screen) then you can post a file of the whole thing. If you have the dyno run files you can pull down the dynojet viewer and overlay any run you like.
160 with an Intake only is just about an absurd statement. A GSR on a dynojet stock makes about 140 whp. That is a modest 18% drivetrain loss. Figure 10 whp from an Intake (CAI: AEM, Iceman . . ) then you get to 150. To get 160 at the wheels you would have to be making 25 more hp than stock at the crank off just an intake. Like I said above unlikely. Tune maybe but still unlikely. I have seen some Type-Rs make only 163-164 with an Intake.
One thing to make clear is what type of Dyno you ran on. A DynoJet and Dynapack run MUCH higher numbers while a Mustang Dyno will show much lower numbers. This means nothing except that the numbers are not comparable. Most people speak in Dynojet numbers so if you dyno'd on something else that info woudl help.
160 with an Intake only is just about an absurd statement. A GSR on a dynojet stock makes about 140 whp. That is a modest 18% drivetrain loss. Figure 10 whp from an Intake (CAI: AEM, Iceman . . ) then you get to 150. To get 160 at the wheels you would have to be making 25 more hp than stock at the crank off just an intake. Like I said above unlikely. Tune maybe but still unlikely. I have seen some Type-Rs make only 163-164 with an Intake.
One thing to make clear is what type of Dyno you ran on. A DynoJet and Dynapack run MUCH higher numbers while a Mustang Dyno will show much lower numbers. This means nothing except that the numbers are not comparable. Most people speak in Dynojet numbers so if you dyno'd on something else that info woudl help.
02-24-2004 | 11:12 AM
#19
Moderator Alumni
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
From: North America
Originally Posted by SuperStar19
I dynoed my motor yesterday with SRI/Header/Hi-Flow cat/Apex-N1.
My put down 166whp and 125lbs or torque.
From the last dyno in october there is a 2lb loss or torque which may have come from the install of the larger header and cat, but its not a huge loss so it really could have been something like the car not being cool enough.
My put down 166whp and 125lbs or torque.
From the last dyno in october there is a 2lb loss or torque which may have come from the install of the larger header and cat, but its not a huge loss so it really could have been something like the car not being cool enough.
02-24-2004 | 11:51 AM
#20
Administrator
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cheezthis
Trey...I'll post it up later if you don't believe me. It's a dynojet though, not mustang or dynapack. Absurd? I don't think so. I see a lot of stock GSR run around 150 whp. Stock ITR's...165 whp. Double-A made 165...bone stock 97 ITR.
150 on a Mustang Dyno is pretty high as well. Can anyone get the actual dynorun files? We can overlay them and compare them to other cars that way. Also anyone doing runs in 3rd gear is artifically pumping dyno numbers. This works on some cars and isn't indicative of the actual power. Not accusing anyone just saying peak means very little regardless but especially when you do things like run in 3rd gear or pull a power steering belt you use daily.