Best Performance tires with tread life in mind.
#11
Originally posted by CiViC2nR86
but if stock is 55 series, shouldn't I get 205/55/15?
but if stock is 55 series, shouldn't I get 205/55/15?
So you would want to go 205 (which is 205mm) /50 (50% of 205) /15 (rim diameter).
#12
Actually, I have been doing A LOT of thinking, and I have decided that I cannot get tires every year, I am not made of money.
My new/revised question is, What is the LONGEST LASTING PERFORMANCE TIRES for under $80 a piece?
The Azenis, ES100, and the Potenza's are out of the questions, there thread-life ratings on www.tire-rack.com does not even exceed 200, while the Kumho ECSTA 712 has a rating of over 300, and the AVID V4S has a rating of 500. What is the difference between the Kumho ECSTA 712s and the MX?
My new/revised question is, What is the LONGEST LASTING PERFORMANCE TIRES for under $80 a piece?
The Azenis, ES100, and the Potenza's are out of the questions, there thread-life ratings on www.tire-rack.com does not even exceed 200, while the Kumho ECSTA 712 has a rating of over 300, and the AVID V4S has a rating of 500. What is the difference between the Kumho ECSTA 712s and the MX?
#13
Originally posted by CiViC2nR86
Actually, I have been doing A LOT of thinking, and I have decided that I cannot get tires every year, I am not made of money.
My new/revised question is, What is the LONGEST LASTING PERFORMANCE TIRES for under $80 a piece?
The Azenis, ES100, and the Potenza's are out of the questions, there thread-life ratings on www.tire-rack.com does not even exceed 200, while the Kumho ECSTA 712 has a rating of over 300, and the AVID V4S has a rating of 500. What is the difference between the Kumho ECSTA 712s and the MX?
Actually, I have been doing A LOT of thinking, and I have decided that I cannot get tires every year, I am not made of money.
My new/revised question is, What is the LONGEST LASTING PERFORMANCE TIRES for under $80 a piece?
The Azenis, ES100, and the Potenza's are out of the questions, there thread-life ratings on www.tire-rack.com does not even exceed 200, while the Kumho ECSTA 712 has a rating of over 300, and the AVID V4S has a rating of 500. What is the difference between the Kumho ECSTA 712s and the MX?
#14
The Kumhos are okay, they seem to be lasting longer than the old AVS intermediate that the ES 100 replaced, according to Fats. The yokohama tires were far superior in quality and grip, but you sacrifice wear with grip, in general
#16
yea 205/55 will mess up your speedometer and your handeling the second number the 50 or 55 in this case is the ratio of width toheight of the tire the smaller then number the lower profile so when u widen the tire u want to make that number smaller
#17
My 205/50 Kumho 712's have lasted ~30k now, on -2.5+ degree camber as well.
My only complaints are they are wayyyyyy too loud when you get some miles on them, and they are absolutely undriveable in the snow. Other than that, wet and dry traction are solid.
Long life is a priority for me as well...Ill most likely give the ES100's a shot next time.
My only complaints are they are wayyyyyy too loud when you get some miles on them, and they are absolutely undriveable in the snow. Other than that, wet and dry traction are solid.
Long life is a priority for me as well...Ill most likely give the ES100's a shot next time.