Mechanical Twins?
07-15-2003, 03:04 AM
#11
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moncton, N.B. Canada
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by ragerized
steal one :naughty:
...or you could always find one used or on ebay or something.
steal one :naughty:
...or you could always find one used or on ebay or something.
Jason
07-15-2003, 11:03 AM
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moncton, N.B. Canada
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Was there an "STD" Crx?...and if so...is it mechanically the same as a Civic STD?
This manual that I have found says that it is for a 91 CRX, but is comatible with most 88-91 Civics. It refers to STD/DX being lumped together and the Si/HF being lumped together for example,
23-10 Engine Wiring Harness - STD/DX models
23-11 (photo)
23-12 Engine Wiring Harness - Si/HF models
23-13 (photo)
So does that idicate that the STD and the DX are the same...or just for that part?
Jason
This manual that I have found says that it is for a 91 CRX, but is comatible with most 88-91 Civics. It refers to STD/DX being lumped together and the Si/HF being lumped together for example,
23-10 Engine Wiring Harness - STD/DX models
23-11 (photo)
23-12 Engine Wiring Harness - Si/HF models
23-13 (photo)
So does that idicate that the STD and the DX are the same...or just for that part?
Jason
07-15-2003, 03:25 PM
#13
I'm RICK JAMES, bitch!
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STD and DX both were DPFI with nearly the exact same engine so I see no reason why it would be different. And Si and HF were also both MPFI and the HF engine was like a detuned Si engine so I see no reason why their harness wouldn't be the same.
07-15-2003, 04:58 PM
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moncton, N.B. Canada
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by FourthGenHatch
STD and DX both were DPFI with nearly the exact same engine so I see no reason why it would be different. And Si and HF were also both MPFI and the HF engine was like a detuned Si engine so I see no reason why their harness wouldn't be the same.
STD and DX both were DPFI with nearly the exact same engine so I see no reason why it would be different. And Si and HF were also both MPFI and the HF engine was like a detuned Si engine so I see no reason why their harness wouldn't be the same.
The STD CRX and the DX CRX are essentially the same...
So thus the STD CRX/DXCRX/STD Civic are all essentially the same?...is this correct?
Mechanically are they the same, I mean with things like control arm, suspension, wiring...etc.
...sighJason
07-16-2003, 05:55 AM
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Moncton, N.B. Canada
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Magik
So essentially you're saying that the STD CRX and the STD Civic are the same...
The STD CRX and the DX CRX are essentially the same...
So thus the STD CRX/DXCRX/STD Civic are all essentially the same?...is this correct?
Mechanically are they the same, I mean with things like control arm, suspension, wiring...etc.
...sigh
Jason
So essentially you're saying that the STD CRX and the STD Civic are the same...
The STD CRX and the DX CRX are essentially the same...
So thus the STD CRX/DXCRX/STD Civic are all essentially the same?...is this correct?
Mechanically are they the same, I mean with things like control arm, suspension, wiring...etc.
...sighJason
Jason