Least expensive, fastest Honda?
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kai
Assuming you mean a 300ZX, you might as well compair an aftermarket turbo'ed Chevy Baretta to a Corvette. These vehicles are in completely different classes and price ranges.
Originally Posted by Kai
It depends which 300ZX you are talking about.
Originally Posted by Kai
The Miata manual isn't that great.
Four wheels what? :eh:
#12
Rotorphile.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by augy
Well, again, the early 90's models are within 1 or at most 2 thou of each other in the used car market around here.
Originally Posted by augy
VR4.
Originally Posted by augy
Does your RX-7 Have the same tranny as the Miata? Or have you actually driven one?
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kai
When you say "early 90's" I think single turbo option late-80's, early 90's body. Those sell for much cheaper then the latest, flush headlight twin-turbo option 300ZX's.Around here, you're lucky to even see a VR4, much less to find one for under $10k. $8k above normal CRX pricing. The 86-91 N/A RX-7 trans and the Miata five speed trans are both of the "M" type. I love my "M" trans, it's just nothing too special (esp. since I have an 87.5+ .697 5th instead of my stock .711 5th. )
... How did you end up with the non-stock 5th?
#14
Rotorphile.
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 10,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kai
$8k above normal CRX pricing.
Originally Posted by augy
$8000 for a CRX????
Originally Posted by augy
... How did you end up with the non-stock 5th?
#15
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cupertino, CA
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kai
Read that again. $8000 more then what a $2000 CRX sells for.I used an N/A S5 (89-91, all .697 5th gear) transmission the last time I replaced mine. All 86's, like mine, and early 87's came stock with a .711 5th gear.
#16
Originally Posted by Kai
A CRX with a turbo D16A6 would be cheaper and faster.
#17
2 tone Rex
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alexandria, LA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea, stock CRX Si has D16A6, and no the D series and B series cannot share turbo kits... I know for one the manifold will not be the same... Not sure what else...
#18
just turbo ur dseries and upgrade ur fuel management and it should last you a while. and if u did blow ur motor a dx or si motor is really cheap. u can prob pick one up for 50 bucks, and youll smash on b16s all day.
#19
Yea. That turbo sounded good until i saw the prices here http://www.turbo-kits.com/crx_turbo_kits.html. 3 and 4 grand. That could easily get me a complete changeover b16a(motor mounts, a/c mount and all), installing it myself.
#20
Registered Rota Dealer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've seen complete used turbo kits (BOV, IC, Fuel, etc) go for $1500-2000 for D-series. Only thing you would have to worry about is rebuilding the turbo if necessary.