Notices

differences between Si and other CRX's

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-23-2002, 08:04 AM
  #21  
WhiteRice
Senior Member
 
WhiteRice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by IrradiatedKitty


ok.. i don't know if i did this "quote" thing right.. but yes, CRX's DO have moon roofs... i've seen Si's and DX's with moonroofs
HF's don't have moon roofs.
Old 08-24-2002, 11:59 PM
  #22  
IrradiatedKitty
Member
 
IrradiatedKitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: san Diego, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by WhiteRice


HF's don't have moon roofs.


where did i say HF's have moonroofs?!?!?!? :P HF's were built to be super light and super fuel efficient... a moonroof or sunroof would weigh it down waaaay too much :P
Old 08-25-2002, 05:47 AM
  #23  
WhiteRice
Senior Member
 
WhiteRice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by IrradiatedKitty

where did i say HF's have moonroofs?!?!?!? :P HF's were built to be super light and super fuel efficient... a moonroof or sunroof would weigh it down waaaay too much :P
You didn't, just throwing my $.02 in there, that's all....you'd mentioned Si's and Dx's had them, so I thought I'd finish the thought and say HF's didn't!!! :fawk:
Old 08-26-2002, 10:05 PM
  #24  
IrradiatedKitty
Member
 
IrradiatedKitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: san Diego, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by WhiteRice


You didn't, just throwing my $.02 in there, that's all....you'd mentioned Si's and Dx's had them, so I thought I'd finish the thought and say HF's didn't!!! :fawk:


haha... yeah, ok. at first i was just like *oook.. this guy can't read* but it alll worked out. yeah.. HF's don't have anything... they're good for getting 60 miles to the gallon.. but annnyways :-p
Old 08-27-2002, 10:38 AM
  #25  
ISP James
DAMIMRED
Thread Starter
 
ISP James's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 13,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by IrradiatedKitty




haha... yeah, ok. at first i was just like *oook.. this guy can't read* but it alll worked out. yeah.. HF's don't have anything... they're good for getting 60 miles to the gallon.. but annnyways :-p
b18a + turbo = not good for getting 16 mpg
Old 08-27-2002, 10:38 AM
  #26  
ISP James
DAMIMRED
Thread Starter
 
ISP James's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 13,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

whoaaaaaa i fked that up i meant 60 not 16 whoops!
Old 08-27-2002, 11:12 AM
  #27  
WhiteRice
Senior Member
 
WhiteRice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

HAHA Didn't even notice that...damn!
Old 08-27-2002, 01:52 PM
  #28  
IrradiatedKitty
Member
 
IrradiatedKitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: san Diego, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hahah... yeah, the HF STOCK is good for getting 60 miles to the gallon :P
Old 08-28-2002, 05:14 PM
  #29  
eg9
Junior Member
 
eg9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sloville
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

si=heavy
heavy=slow
Old 09-04-2002, 10:39 AM
  #30  
IrradiatedKitty
Member
 
IrradiatedKitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: san Diego, CA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

hf + b18 + turbo + upgraded suspension to handle the weight = marginally lighter than Si, and an Si has a sunroof

si + b18 + turbo= not as much of a need for a better and more expensive suspension, and they have a sunroof



Quick Reply: differences between Si and other CRX's



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 AM.