turbo b18b in accord?
10-06-2004 | 08:24 PM
#11
Reset?
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: nor cal
Originally Posted by bonestock
wth are you talking about. research before you give advice. both f22b1 and f22b1 are 8.8:1 CR and both have the same bore and stroke. IMO the b2 would be better to boost, dont have to mess with vtec engagements. with boost low compression is good.
i just saw that on msn autos or some shit
10-06-2004 | 10:17 PM
#12
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
if your gonna go turbo in the accord either stay with the f22 or get the h23 out of the si prelude it has better internals and cheaper than the h22 the h22 is nice but not the best for turbo unless you build the motor with better internals...
just my 2 cents
just my 2 cents
10-07-2004 | 05:54 AM
#13
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,692
Likes: 0
From: Bethlehem PA
Originally Posted by A_D
because h22 EK's don't exist 
i'd go with f22b1 turbo
or get the vtec head on there if you have a b2
i think that the b2 has a higher compression ratio than the b1
i think the b1 has like 7.5 and the b2 has 8.5 or 9.1
so putting the vtec head on a bottom end with higer compression than the regular b1 has, with a turbo, could be an interesting setup
the compression isn't too high to where you can't run boost
i'd go with f22b1 turbo
or get the vtec head on there if you have a b2
i think that the b2 has a higher compression ratio than the b1
i think the b1 has like 7.5 and the b2 has 8.5 or 9.1
so putting the vtec head on a bottom end with higer compression than the regular b1 has, with a turbo, could be an interesting setup
the compression isn't too high to where you can't run boost
Sisters b/f --- has a crx w/ an H22 -----you gotta see that huge engine in that little car.
Sister b/f brother. ---96 civic hatchback with an H22.
10-07-2004 | 07:47 AM
#14
Thread Starter
Ridin Dirty
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,839
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte,NC
Originally Posted by bonestock
wth are you talking about. research before you give advice. both f22b1 and f22b1 are 8.8:1 CR and both have the same bore and stroke. IMO the b2 would be better to boost, dont have to mess with vtec engagements. with boost low compression is good.
thanks for the help guys....well anyone have the specs for the h23? im guessing it has a little more torque than the h22 and i know the power is less
10-07-2004 | 09:18 PM
#15
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 37,274
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
It's possible, I've seen it done on a 4th gen Accord before. He used a fairly built and boosted GS-R motor and was pulling low 14's I think. :happysad:
1800cc just ain't enough to move 3000 pounds. If you want to do a B-Block, do a B20Z/B16A frankenstein turbo. Or just a B20 turbo
h:
The only real trouble the guy had was engine mounts.
1800cc just ain't enough to move 3000 pounds. If you want to do a B-Block, do a B20Z/B16A frankenstein turbo. Or just a B20 turbo
h:The only real trouble the guy had was engine mounts.
03-03-2008 | 08:29 AM
#16
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: miami
i would go with a f22 block with a h22 or h23 head then boost it the f22 is the best block to boost on since it has cast iron sleeves it is heavy duty (lol) it is cheap easy and interesting check it out http://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1664547 scroll down to where it says swaps right there its going to explain every thing you need to know about this head swap !
