Notices

Which one would you choose and why?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-29-2004 | 08:06 PM
  #31  
SRT_Andy's Avatar
SRT_Andy
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Labrador
I'm not talking crap here, dude. What I'm saying is that although turbos WILL win races, they simply aren't as durable or reliable. If some of you guys have had success with these engine-destroyers, then I'm very happy for you. But superchargers are kind and gentle to your engine, and if someone wants a RELIABLE Honda Civic that's considerably faster than stock, turbo simply isn't an option. Plus superchargers provide that satisfying low-end torque you simply don't get in a turbo. Sorry man, but that's just the way it is.
I might get warning points for this, but I'm going to flame you now - you're an idiot. You're spouting off about how turbos suck and they're unreliable - that's B.S. I've been running mine at 10-11psi for over 2 years now without a problem. I put over 35,000 boosted miles on the motor and drive it daily. I spank Civic Si's with JRSCs at equal boost levels. THAT is what you're talking about? Yeah, you might get me off the line (spinning b/c of your "low end torque") but I'll catch you 2 seconds later.

Originally Posted by Labrador
Right now my 2000 Civic EX 5spd is stock, but I'm planning on installing a Jackson Racing supercharger kit as soon as I have enough money (which should be in about three weeks).
I hope you enjoy the slowness and getting beat by someone with low-end traction.

Originally Posted by Labrador
I'm not trying to race anyone here, I just want my car to be a little quicker.
I hope that's all you're hoping for, because a "little" quicker is all you're going to get.

Originally Posted by Labrador
And, please, let's not flame here. I'm just stating my honest opinion on the whole turbo/super thing.
Didn't sound like an opinion to me, it sounded like you had done some research, but you're just spouting off at the mouth. Quit now while you still have the chance to redeem yourself.
Old 01-30-2004 | 01:28 AM
  #32  
Labrador's Avatar
Labrador
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by SleeperCivicEX
I might get warning points for this, but I'm going to flame you now - you're an idiot. You're spouting off about how turbos suck and they're unreliable - that's B.S. I've been running mine at 10-11psi for over 2 years now without a problem. I put over 35,000 boosted miles on the motor and drive it daily. I spank Civic Si's with JRSCs at equal boost levels. THAT is what you're talking about? Yeah, you might get me off the line (spinning b/c of your "low end torque") but I'll catch you 2 seconds later.
Right. Like I said, I'm not going to race anyone here, and I know turbos will win races; my argument is strictly on reliability and long term durability; in this case, turbos just don't stack up.


I hope you enjoy the slowness and getting beat by someone with low-end traction.
You're right about this one. A front wheel drive Honda Civic like mine is NOT going to have any traction to compete with a rear wheel drive Mustang or Camaro.


I hope that's all you're hoping for, because a "little" quicker is all you're going to get.
Well, yes, I would appreciate some improvement over my stock 127 hp D16Y8. It would be nice to not have to rev past 5k to get some power.


Didn't sound like an opinion to me, it sounded like you had done some research, but you're just spouting off at the mouth. Quit now while you still have the chance to redeem yourself.
Um, okay. But you have to admit, some people rank reliability and driveability over sheer speed. In other words a "daily driver". The words "turbo'ed daily driver" is an oxymoron, agreed?
Old 01-30-2004 | 03:31 AM
  #33  
SRT_Andy's Avatar
SRT_Andy
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Labrador
Um, okay. But you have to admit, some people rank reliability and driveability over sheer speed. In other words a "daily driver". The words "turbo'ed daily driver" is an oxymoron, agreed?
I've ran a 13.9 in the 1/4 mile. Also, I've probably ran the 1/4 over 300 times. What's your point? If you do it right, you can have speed and reliability. You're jut assuming that a fast, turbocharged car isn't reliable. It's funny because a supercharger does the same thing and is less efficient, so I'm not sure why you expect one to be more reliable than the other.
Old 01-30-2004 | 03:43 AM
  #34  
pomansouth's Avatar
pomansouth
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
From: montgomery alabama
Default

Originally Posted by Labrador
Um, okay. But you have to admit, some people rank reliability and driveability over sheer speed. In other words a "daily driver". The words "turbo'ed daily driver" is an oxymoron, agreed?
one BIG reason why turbos are easier on a daily driven car, they are not in constant boost. I dont know why turbos have such a bad name, i guess it is because you have to actually spend time tuning it. Supercharger you get poor gas mileage all of the time, turbo...only when boosting, turbos have better peak power, and their peak power just happens to start at out power band, dont get me wrong, jrsc's work fairly well for a vtec motor and auto tranny, but they are no good for a non-vtec motor. Jrsc's have a big heat prob, they only make power to a certain rpm, vortech's charger doesnt hit peak power till redline, from these points i can see that the better way to go is turbo. it is safer for your motor, more economical, and faster overall.
Old 01-30-2004 | 04:29 AM
  #35  
Bumnah's Avatar
Bumnah
So OG it hurts.
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by SleeperCivicEX
I might get warning points for this, but I'm going to flame you now - you're an idiot. You're spouting off about how turbos suck and they're unreliable - that's B.S. I've been running mine at 10-11psi for over 2 years now without a problem. I put over 35,000 boosted miles on the motor and drive it daily. I spank Civic Si's with JRSCs at equal boost levels. THAT is what you're talking about? Yeah, you might get me off the line (spinning b/c of your "low end torque") but I'll catch you 2 seconds later.



I hope you enjoy the slowness and getting beat by someone with low-end traction.



I hope that's all you're hoping for, because a "little" quicker is all you're going to get.



Didn't sound like an opinion to me, it sounded like you had done some research, but you're just spouting off at the mouth. Quit now while you still have the chance to redeem yourself.

way to be mature. :down:
__________________
Project EVA - The Track Package
-----
Project EVA
-----
Old 01-30-2004 | 05:17 AM
  #36  
westcoaststyle's Avatar
westcoaststyle
Still here... sorta...
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by Labrador
Um, okay. But you have to admit, some people rank reliability and driveability over sheer speed. In other words a "daily driver". The words "turbo'ed daily driver" is an oxymoron, agreed?
I have a 12.6 sec turbo daily driver. :dunno:

I'm seriously (not flaming) wondering where you got your understanding of turbos/supers? Did you hear this from some friend or something? Seriously.
Old 01-30-2004 | 05:21 AM
  #37  
pomansouth's Avatar
pomansouth
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 0
From: montgomery alabama
Default

Originally Posted by westcoaststyle
I have a 12.6 sec turbo daily driver. :dunno:

I'm seriously (not flaming) wondering where you got your understanding of turbos/supers? Did you hear this from some friend or something? Seriously.
sounds like he got the info from his sister :chuckles:
Old 01-30-2004 | 07:58 AM
  #38  
alphaxxn's Avatar
alphaxxn
4500rpm hesitation
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,374
Likes: 0
From: Hesperia
Default

Turbo, I dont think personally that a charger provides enough of a advancement on a 4 cylinder engine.
Old 01-30-2004 | 11:54 AM
  #39  
white_n_slow's Avatar
white_n_slow
it's my D in a B
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Default

Originally Posted by Labrador
Um, okay. But you have to admit, some people rank reliability and driveability over sheer speed. In other words a "daily driver". The words "turbo'ed daily driver" is an oxymoron, agreed?
I just don't understand where you get this whole "reliability" argument from :thinking: Its totally unfounded. There is nothing that makes a s/c intrinsically more reliable than turbo. nothing.
Old 01-31-2004 | 05:29 PM
  #40  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Labrador
Um, okay. But you have to admit, some people rank reliability and driveability over sheer speed. In other words a "daily driver". The words "turbo'ed daily driver" is an oxymoron, agreed?
Turbos and superchargers provide their increase in power in identical ways. Both compress the intake charge to force more air into the engine.

Superchargers run off the crank. Turbos run off exhaust gas.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:35 AM.