Notices

Which one would you choose and why?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-29-2004 | 07:26 AM
  #21  
Wharbone's Avatar
Wharbone
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,157
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

Originally Posted by westcoaststyle
You bring back a super dead thread just to talk crap? You really need to do some research before you start posting stupid ass crap. h:
WTF? I didn't even realize it was a dead thread until now. If a thread has to be brought back, make it useful.
Old 01-29-2004 | 08:58 AM
  #22  
white_n_slow's Avatar
white_n_slow
it's my D in a B
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Default

wow. this thread is ancient. :eek3:
Old 01-29-2004 | 09:25 AM
  #23  
Labrador's Avatar
Labrador
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by westcoaststyle
You bring back a super dead thread just to talk crap? You really need to do some research before you start posting stupid ass crap. h:
I'm not talking crap here, dude. What I'm saying is that although turbos WILL win races, they simply aren't as durable or reliable. If some of you guys have had success with these engine-destroyers, then I'm very happy for you. But superchargers are kind and gentle to your engine, and if someone wants a RELIABLE Honda Civic that's considerably faster than stock, turbo simply isn't an option. Plus superchargers provide that satisfying low-end torque you simply don't get in a turbo. Sorry man, but that's just the way it is.

Right now my 2000 Civic EX 5spd is stock, but I'm planning on installing a Jackson Racing supercharger kit as soon as I have enough money (which should be in about three weeks). I'm not trying to race anyone here, I just want my car to be a little quicker.

And, please, let's not flame here. I'm just stating my honest opinion on the whole turbo/super thing.
Old 01-29-2004 | 09:33 AM
  #24  
white_n_slow's Avatar
white_n_slow
it's my D in a B
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Default

superchargers often run hotter, increase intake temperature more, put more parasitic drag on your motor, and put more stress on your water and oil cooling systems. Basically, anything that force-feeds your engine will decrease its functional life, but a well-designed turbo kit is actually better for the longevity of an engine than most supercharger kits. Moreover, it isn't constantly used (only when spooled), so you could drive gingerly and incur NO MORE wear than normal driving on a stock engine.
Old 01-29-2004 | 05:05 PM
  #25  
Bumnah's Avatar
Bumnah
So OG it hurts.
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 6,592
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

did people skip my post?

and i didn't take his post to be slanderous:dunno:
__________________
Project EVA - The Track Package
-----
Project EVA
-----
Old 01-29-2004 | 05:22 PM
  #26  
westcoaststyle's Avatar
westcoaststyle
Still here... sorta...
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by Labrador
I'm not talking crap here, dude. What I'm saying is that although turbos WILL win races, they simply aren't as durable or reliable. If some of you guys have had success with these engine-destroyers, then I'm very happy for you. But superchargers are kind and gentle to your engine, and if someone wants a RELIABLE Honda Civic that's considerably faster than stock, turbo simply isn't an option. Plus superchargers provide that satisfying low-end torque you simply don't get in a turbo. Sorry man, but that's just the way it is.

Right now my 2000 Civic EX 5spd is stock, but I'm planning on installing a Jackson Racing supercharger kit as soon as I have enough money (which should be in about three weeks). I'm not trying to race anyone here, I just want my car to be a little quicker.

And, please, let's not flame here. I'm just stating my honest opinion on the whole turbo/super thing.
Yes, but you will never win the super > turbo / turbo > super arguement.

I have a turbo, I make ~300 whp daily and it runs great. SleeperCivicEX has had a turbo for over 2 years running at 11psi daily and dragging almost every weekend. His runs great too.

I can respect an opinion about most things, but when technical isses are brought into the conversation I expect some facts to back it up. h:

That's all I'm saying.
Old 01-29-2004 | 05:24 PM
  #27  
westcoaststyle's Avatar
westcoaststyle
Still here... sorta...
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Default

Originally Posted by Bumnah
putting a turbo on a 4 banger increases it's effeciency. the reason you can put a parasitic drag component like a supercharger on a mustang and f150 and a regal, is because they are all higher displacement. a sohc puts out barely over 100 hp to the wheels, and like 90 lbs of torque. that's not the best setup for a blower.

turbo is spooled up by your waste, increasing your effeciency of the motor.

now how well it does, depends on tuning. you can have a fully forged block with all the bells and whistles but unless it's tuned properly it's going to run like crap and blow just as quick.

honda motors are the most over engineered engines around, they can take the added abuse (eventually a rebuild is necessary), but with proper fuel and air mixture you can keep pretty good reliablity. score yourself a hondata.


get a turbo, and hondata with the boost option. get it tuned and you'll make good hp.
I couldn't agree more.
Old 01-29-2004 | 06:11 PM
  #28  
93HybridCX's Avatar
93HybridCX
Beast from the East
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,705
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

Originally Posted by white_n_slow
superchargers often run hotter, increase intake temperature more, put more parasitic drag on your motor, and put more stress on your water and oil cooling systems. Basically, anything that force-feeds your engine will decrease its functional life, but a well-designed turbo kit is actually better for the longevity of an engine than most supercharger kits. Moreover, it isn't constantly used (only when spooled), so you could drive gingerly and incur NO MORE wear than normal driving on a stock engine.
I agree 100%
Old 01-29-2004 | 07:08 PM
  #29  
qtiger's Avatar
qtiger
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by white_n_slow
superchargers often run hotter, increase intake temperature more, put more parasitic drag on your motor, and put more stress on your water and oil cooling systems. Basically, anything that force-feeds your engine will decrease its functional life, but a well-designed turbo kit is actually better for the longevity of an engine than most supercharger kits.
Exactly what I was about to say.

Any decent turbocharger system is much, much more engine friendly than the average supercharger.

Even if we look at factory solutions, think of how many cars do and have come turbocharged from the factory. Two words: turbo diesel. I won't even bother listing examples because they're virtually limitless.

Originally Posted by Labrador
(Think about this; the legendary Mustang Cobra, F-150 Lightning, and Buick Regal SC all use a supercharger, while those POS volkswagens and mitsubishis and subarus use turbos.)
Grand National. Enough said.
Old 01-29-2004 | 07:25 PM
  #30  
white_n_slow's Avatar
white_n_slow
it's my D in a B
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 24,787
Likes: 1
From: Your Mom's House
Default

Originally Posted by qtiger
Grand National. Enough said.
:werd: excellent point.



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:42 AM.