Supercharger or Turbo
05-01-2003 | 06:04 PM
#11
Banned
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,220
Likes: 0
Originally posted by thaveen
hey crucial, all i wanted was some more pros and cons, and also what i would need for each so stfu and read the original post, i never asked what i should get, just as i never asked if i should get a cf hood :madfawk::madfawk:
hey crucial, all i wanted was some more pros and cons, and also what i would need for each so stfu and read the original post, i never asked what i should get, just as i never asked if i should get a cf hood :madfawk::madfawk:
cry me a river.
05-01-2003 | 07:32 PM
#13
Thread Starter
Seņor Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,639
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh/Columbus
its just the truth, theres no reason for the hating. i look to the members on H-A for their wisdom, not for them to tell me what to do. If you read my posts that would be evident. Also, forced induction is not an aesthetic upgrade, so yes i do in fact want what is better. There is room for personal preference on modifications that are for looks and that are seen, but when it comes to my engine, i want whats going to make it faster safely and still be attainable when considering price. :joshers:
05-01-2003 | 07:33 PM
#14
Still here... sorta...
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 17,177
Likes: 2
From: CO
Originally posted by thaveen
its just the truth, theres no reason for the hating. i look to the members on H-A for their wisdom, not for them to tell me what to do. If you read my posts that would be evident. Also, forced induction is not an aesthetic upgrade, so yes i do in fact want what is better. There is room for personal preference on modifications that are for looks and that are seen, but when it comes to my engine, i want whats going to make it faster safely and still be attainable when considering price. :joshers:
its just the truth, theres no reason for the hating. i look to the members on H-A for their wisdom, not for them to tell me what to do. If you read my posts that would be evident. Also, forced induction is not an aesthetic upgrade, so yes i do in fact want what is better. There is room for personal preference on modifications that are for looks and that are seen, but when it comes to my engine, i want whats going to make it faster safely and still be attainable when considering price. :joshers:
Turbo > Super.
05-01-2003 | 08:27 PM
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
From: Northern Va
why would you "need" a 3 in" exhaust for a turbo and would not need a bigger exhaust for the superchanger. both would benifit. internals would be the same for both. what i mean is that if you need to switch your internals for say 12 psi then you need to switch them regardless of what type of FI you use. superchagers take more power to make power, ie parasitic losses. i would say go with the turbo. it takes more knowledge to set it up properly, because it is easier to pump too much boost, or miss match components, but once you learn more it will give you much more in the long run.
05-01-2003 | 08:30 PM
#18
Banned
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,220
Likes: 0
Originally posted by thaveen
i want whats going to make it faster safely and still be attainable when considering price. :joshers:
i want whats going to make it faster safely and still be attainable when considering price. :joshers:
hhmmmmm thinking what the quote is..hhmmm
someone help me out on this...aaaggghhh
its something like 3 things, pick 2..
you cant go fast and expect the reliablity to be the same as a stock motor..no way no how.